What I think is the most mysterious Q drop of them all, and why.

posted 206 days ago by we_kill_creativity 206 days ago by we_kill_creativity +77 / -0

You can count the people who have the full picture on two hands. Of those (less than 10 people) only three are non-military. Why is this relevant? Game theory. Outside of a potential operator who has been dialed-in w/ orders (specific to his/her mission) nobody else has this information. Operators never divulge. Alice & Wonderland.

Specifically this line:

Outside of a potential operator who has been dialed-in w/ orders (specific to his/her mission) nobody else has this information.

I've never seen anyone focus in on that one. But it's ALWAYS stood out to me. One of the craziest things about all this is who would have been in on it from the beginning, right? This post, and that line, seem to be telling us that someone else is part of this, but...only potentially...

So even team Q wasn't sure? Who is this one, apparently special person? And how are they actually related to the plan? Who would have all the same information as the original Q people, but not really be part of them? And what is their mission? Where did they get their orders from? And why are they a "potential" operator?

56 comments

56 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (56)

sorted by:

▲ 7 ▼

– sueanon2017 7 points 205 days ago +7 / -0

but they said "his/her mission"...

so that means generic operators, One of which might be specifically called upon.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 0 ▼

– we_kill_creativity [S] 0 points 205 days ago +1 / -1

The enemy would like to know as much about this person as they can, so they didn't want to specify their gender. The post is talking about who has the full picture. They mention a, singular operator, who has the full picture. The kind of person you are talking about would not have that information.

They are dialed in with order specific to their mission based on their shared knowledge of the full picture.

The grammar of this line:

only makes sense if that potential operator has the same information as:

the people who have the full picture