The spike protein is not part of anyone's DNA or genome.
Evidence suggests reverse transcription of mRNA into a DNA copy is possible. This further suggests the possibility of intergenerational transmission if germline cells incorporate the DNA copy into the host genome.
Yeah, but the point is, the spike protein is not the mRNA component. It is what the mRNA component engages the cell to produce.
I'm just addressing the OP comment that incorrectly draws an equivalence between the spike protein itself and the genetic components in the injections or the recipient's DNA.
The video provides a pretty clear explanation of this:
Evidence suggests reverse transcription of mRNA into a DNA copy is possible. This further suggests the possibility of intergenerational transmission if germline cells incorporate the DNA copy into the host genome.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10452662/
Yeah, but the point is, the spike protein is not the mRNA component. It is what the mRNA component engages the cell to produce.
I'm just addressing the OP comment that incorrectly draws an equivalence between the spike protein itself and the genetic components in the injections or the recipient's DNA.
The video provides a pretty clear explanation of this:
https://rumble.com/v4slxuz-how-mrna-vaccine-cell-damage-can-be-reversed-through-lipid-replacement-ther.html