You should read more than just the headline or even this article if you want the full details on the fine. Saying it was just "in his own defense" is one way to spin it.
LOL. I suppose sarcasm does not transmit itself very well.
Thanks for telling me what to do, I always love to tell people that their wishes are not always my commands. In any case, you know nothing about me, and how much I read.
I am implying that he was prolly tweeting ot truthing, could be in his own self defense. So, I suppose I am picking on the choice of words. I don't think Trump was speaking.
Unless the judge was onjecting to a rally. That's the problem then, because rallies are protected political speech. I don't think that a judge can interfere with what is said by politicians at rallies. I don't think judges would make such a blunder, So, I think this is about a tweet. Could you clarify?
Of course, the gag order should not exist at all, given that saying something in one's own defense, in public, should still be allowed. Hell, have it out in the media then. But the Dems would lose.
Since when does speaking out in one's own defense constitute a breach of a gag-order?
Anyway - we love public backlashes. It seems that the judge still worries over what people think of him.
You should read more than just the headline or even this article if you want the full details on the fine. Saying it was just "in his own defense" is one way to spin it.
LOL. I suppose sarcasm does not transmit itself very well.
Thanks for telling me what to do, I always love to tell people that their wishes are not always my commands. In any case, you know nothing about me, and how much I read.
ROFLMAO, even.
To make sure this doesn't happen again in the future, what part of
was sarcasm? If the entire thing, then you were implying that it wasn't "speaking out in one's own defense"?
I am implying that he was prolly tweeting ot truthing, could be in his own self defense. So, I suppose I am picking on the choice of words. I don't think Trump was speaking.
Unless the judge was onjecting to a rally. That's the problem then, because rallies are protected political speech. I don't think that a judge can interfere with what is said by politicians at rallies. I don't think judges would make such a blunder, So, I think this is about a tweet. Could you clarify?
Of course, the gag order should not exist at all, given that saying something in one's own defense, in public, should still be allowed. Hell, have it out in the media then. But the Dems would lose.