I scrolled through her thread, couldn't see sauce anywhere. How did she come across this? Where is it from? What's the explanation that gives it veracity?
Dang, I hate being the one, but I'm skeptical until I can see a reasonable source. I mean, it's too easy to fabricate stuff like this with screen shots.
It could well be genuine, but without any source or background explaining how good ol' Peggy Dodsen (CEO and President of Urban Broadcasting Company, UBC-TV the hottest new Urban Media company on the planet!, don't you know?) acquired this stuff, I'm going to play devil's avocado and suspend my belief.
Plus, Peggy types in ALL CAPS. WHAT'S WITH THAT PEGGY?
Great content to make good ol' Peggy's x account and business 'Urban Broadcasting Company' get lots of attention and clicks. She wouldn't be the first wanna-be influencer/journalist (she's a "Professional Journalist and Producer" don't you know) to self promote by fabricating something extremely topical.
Also (URGENT! Don't you know!) "DONT KNOW HOW LONG THIS WILL BE UP BEFORE THEY TAKE IT DOWN. POSTING EVERYTHING I HAVE INCLUDING SOURCE!"
Except, she posts no source.
Or did I just miss it?
Edit: Uh, OK. "Patrick Webb". No idea who that is.... Anyone?
Wait, it gets better:
Here's Patrick's source, apparently:
according to LA source familiar with local organizers.
Sigh. Yeah, but it just feels like I've been doing this a LOT recently. Like every time I engage with a post, I'm calling out in the voice of the skeptical Devil's Avocado.
Thankfully, I guess I'm obscure enough that my vociferous objections don't ruffle too many feathers.
Sigh. Yeah, but it just feels like I've been doing this a LOT recently. Like every time I engage with a post, I'm calling out in the voice of the skeptical Devil's Avocado.
I know exactly how you feel. I agree that it's gotten worse recently, but I've been playing Devil's Advocate for years here. (This is not my original account, before someone points out the join date for this name.)
It's so incredibly frustrating to see so many people just automatically believing something, no matter how outlandish, just because some random person posted a screenshot of some other random person making some claim with zero evidence to support it. It really is disheartening to see that here, where people should know better.
And it really takes it to the the point of absurdity when I point out that there is zero evidence to support whatever the OP is claiming just to be called a shill and get deported and banned for it. And the cherry on the top is to see those same people involved bragging about how this is an elite research board and pat themselves on the back for their awesome research skills.🤦♀️
If this is how people are dealing with fellow Anons (and I 100% believe Q is real) who either disagree with them or are pointing out that there is zero evidence for their claims, I can just imagine how they interact with any normies they're able to engage with about Q.
If it's anything like what I've experienced here there's no wondering why we have had such problems with redpilling normies.
There really should be some sort of a basic training program that teaches people how to verify information before spreading it, how to avoid confirmation bias, and how to make logical, persuasive arguments without getting upset or angry because someone doesn't just automatically accept what they're being told.
And dear God, I really wish people would take a little time to really learn about whatever it is they're trying to convince others of before making fools of themselves, and all other Anons by extension.
It is beyond embarrassing to see those "gotcha" type videos of liberals interviewing Q/Trump supporters and making them look idiotic because they don't really understand what they're talking about. If you want to see examples of what I'm talking about, just look up videos of Jordan Klepper or the YouTube Channel Rebel HQ.
I scrolled through her thread, couldn't see sauce anywhere. How did she come across this? Where is it from? What's the explanation that gives it veracity?
Dang, I hate being the one, but I'm skeptical until I can see a reasonable source. I mean, it's too easy to fabricate stuff like this with screen shots.
It could well be genuine, but without any source or background explaining how good ol' Peggy Dodsen (CEO and President of Urban Broadcasting Company, UBC-TV the hottest new Urban Media company on the planet!, don't you know?) acquired this stuff, I'm going to play devil's avocado and suspend my belief.
Plus, Peggy types in ALL CAPS. WHAT'S WITH THAT PEGGY?
Great content to make good ol' Peggy's x account and business 'Urban Broadcasting Company' get lots of attention and clicks. She wouldn't be the first wanna-be influencer/journalist (she's a "Professional Journalist and Producer" don't you know) to self promote by fabricating something extremely topical.
Also (URGENT! Don't you know!) "DONT KNOW HOW LONG THIS WILL BE UP BEFORE THEY TAKE IT DOWN. POSTING EVERYTHING I HAVE INCLUDING SOURCE!"
Except, she posts no source.
Or did I just miss it?
Edit: Uh, OK. "Patrick Webb". No idea who that is.... Anyone?
Wait, it gets better:
Here's Patrick's source, apparently:
https://twitter.com/RealPatrickWebb/status/1785736935496974337
He still doesn't state how he got a hold of these documents....
.... Don't hate being the one ...
We must think for ourselves or all is lost.
Sigh. Yeah, but it just feels like I've been doing this a LOT recently. Like every time I engage with a post, I'm calling out in the voice of the skeptical Devil's Avocado.
Thankfully, I guess I'm obscure enough that my vociferous objections don't ruffle too many feathers.
I know exactly how you feel. I agree that it's gotten worse recently, but I've been playing Devil's Advocate for years here. (This is not my original account, before someone points out the join date for this name.)
It's so incredibly frustrating to see so many people just automatically believing something, no matter how outlandish, just because some random person posted a screenshot of some other random person making some claim with zero evidence to support it. It really is disheartening to see that here, where people should know better.
And it really takes it to the the point of absurdity when I point out that there is zero evidence to support whatever the OP is claiming just to be called a shill and get deported and banned for it. And the cherry on the top is to see those same people involved bragging about how this is an elite research board and pat themselves on the back for their awesome research skills.🤦♀️
If this is how people are dealing with fellow Anons (and I 100% believe Q is real) who either disagree with them or are pointing out that there is zero evidence for their claims, I can just imagine how they interact with any normies they're able to engage with about Q. If it's anything like what I've experienced here there's no wondering why we have had such problems with redpilling normies.
There really should be some sort of a basic training program that teaches people how to verify information before spreading it, how to avoid confirmation bias, and how to make logical, persuasive arguments without getting upset or angry because someone doesn't just automatically accept what they're being told.
And dear God, I really wish people would take a little time to really learn about whatever it is they're trying to convince others of before making fools of themselves, and all other Anons by extension.
It is beyond embarrassing to see those "gotcha" type videos of liberals interviewing Q/Trump supporters and making them look idiotic because they don't really understand what they're talking about. If you want to see examples of what I'm talking about, just look up videos of Jordan Klepper or the YouTube Channel Rebel HQ.