Almost everything in the Protocols, much as I hate to say it, is factual. I am not just talking about the blueprint which obviously the Zionists have been using against us in every minute detail - but the observations about human nature and how they tend to be sheep and turn towards sweet words of equality and turn against those who actually try to help them.

This is the part that keeps me up at night:

The GOYIM have lost the habit of thinking unless prompted by the suggestions of our specialists. Therefore they do not see the urgent necessity of what we, when our kingdom comes, shall adopt at once, namely this, that IT IS ESSENTIAL TO TEACH IN NATIONAL SCHOOLS ONE SIMPLE, TRUE PIECE OF KNOWLEDGE, THE BASIS OF ALL KNOWLEDGE - THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE STRUCTURE OF HUMAN LIFE, OF SOCIAL EXISTENCE, WHICH REQUIRES DIVISION OF LABOR, AND, CONSEQUENTLY, THE DIVISION OF MEN INTO CLASSES AND CONDITIONS. It is essential for all to know that OWING TO DIFFERENCE IN THE OBJECTS OF HUMAN ACTIVITY THERE CANNOT BE ANY EQUALITY, that he, who by any act of his compromises a whole class, cannot be equally responsible before the law with him who affects no one but only his own honor. The true knowledge of the structure of society, into the secrets of which we do not admit the GOYIM, would demonstrate to all men that the positions and work must be kept within a certain circle, that they may not become a source of human suffering, arising from an education which does not correspond with the work which individuals are called upon to do. After a thorough study of this knowledge, the peoples will voluntarily submit to authority and accept such position as is appointed them in the State. In the present state of knowledge and the direction we have given to its development of the people, blindly believing things in print - cherishes - thanks to promptings intended to mislead and to its own ignorance - a blind hatred towards all conditions which it considers above itself, for it has no understanding of the meaning of class and condition.

It makes sense that as long as human nature is sheep-like for the most part, the fact remains that absolute freedom can always be abused by someone to foment the whole enslavement once again.

Is it really the truth that social existence requires division of labour and division of men into classes? Does this change after Great Awakening? Will the consciousness level of all the people get elevated to the point where no one is sheep any more and we can all use our freedoms responsibly even beyond current generations?

It is only with a despotic ruler that plans can be elaborated extensively and clearly in such a way as to distribute the whole properly among the several parts of the machinery of the State: from this the conclusion is inevitable that a satisfactory form of government for any country is one that concentrates in the hands of one responsible person. Without an absolute despotism there can be no existence for civilization which is carried on not by the masses but by their guide, whosoever that person may be. The mob is savage, and displays its savagery at every opportunity. The moment the mob seizes freedom in its hands it quickly turns to anarchy, which in itself is the highest degree of savagery.

OR, is it true that even after Great Awakening, we will still require true monarchy - someone who understands the divine plan and enforces it strictly to keep the society from veering back into the enslavement based on liberalism?

Will democracy or constitutional republic ever work foolproof, even when its just people who are responsible to safeguarding it? Or do we need a higher power (divine power) to constantly keep it safe?

I believe this is something Anons need to discuss a lot.