What exactly was the lie here? From reading the notes of the motion it seems like he originally claimed that all of the evidence presented was
“in their original, intact form as seized” by stating “[t]hey are, with one exception; and that is that the classified documents have been removed and placeholders have been put in the documents”
Based on what I read, the only thing different was that all of the documents were kept in the boxes they were in, but that some of the stuff had shifted when it was moved so it was out of order so not technically "in their original, intact form as seized". I don't know if I'd call that a lie , and it definitely doesn't seem like something Judge Cannon would do anything about. According to the actual motion, the defense has access to all of the files so they should be able to tell if anything is missing but they aren't saying it is. Honestly this really looks like not a big deal if you actually read the motion.
Care to tell me where I'm wrong in the comment? I've seen this a couple times from the gateway pundit where their headline says one thing but the story is completely different. I don't trust them as a source anymore and it bothers me every time I see them at the top of the page here.
What exactly was the lie here? From reading the notes of the motion it seems like he originally claimed that all of the evidence presented was
“in their original, intact form as seized” by stating “[t]hey are, with one exception; and that is that the classified documents have been removed and placeholders have been put in the documents”
Based on what I read, the only thing different was that all of the documents were kept in the boxes they were in, but that some of the stuff had shifted when it was moved so it was out of order so not technically "in their original, intact form as seized". I don't know if I'd call that a lie , and it definitely doesn't seem like something Judge Cannon would do anything about. According to the actual motion, the defense has access to all of the files so they should be able to tell if anything is missing but they aren't saying it is. Honestly this really looks like not a big deal if you actually read the motion.
Bless your heart.
Care to tell me where I'm wrong in the comment? I've seen this a couple times from the gateway pundit where their headline says one thing but the story is completely different. I don't trust them as a source anymore and it bothers me every time I see them at the top of the page here.