Bragg's Witness IMPLODES Case; Trump EXONERATED on Payment; Trial Day 12
(www.youtube.com)
🤡 COURT CONTROL 🤡
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (51)
sorted by:
Did anyone watch this video?
What exoneration is he claiming?
I didn’t watch the video, but just read this elsewhere…
JUST IN: It appears the prosecution just destroyed their entire case in the Trump hush money trial! Trump comptroller, Jeff McConney, just testified that he is the one who instructed the accounting department to classify the payments as "legal expenses." He says he did that because of how Cohen worded the invoices. This entire case is based on the premise that Donald Trump had the payments classified as legal expenses to hide hush money payments. The Judge should immediately throw this case out after that testimony! How much longer can this madness continue?
The video is quite interesting, and that' why I posted it, because it is excruciatingly long-form. The author analyses a tweet string from a reporter in the court. So one gets a blow-by-blow account, and direct quotes from people in court, including the insanity, or almost a peek-a-boo lurid soap-opera, displayed by the judge.
And he manages to organize this via an interactive enhanced 2D matrix-like 'talking points' power-point, which is the first time I have seen such a presentation.
Well, I bothered to watch it, because I make a point of watching stuff I post. The exoneration is basically coming from the in-house accountant 'comptroller'. The prosecution brought this witness, so expected to find some dirt, but instead he is an honest man, who deals with large checks, ALL. THE. TIME.
He stated that he instructed his team to label the payments as 'legal expenses', based on the language on the invoice.
This means that the prosecution's case-premise (that Trump was pulling all the strings, in order to hide-from-his-wife/spend illicit campaign-funds/keep his hooker-visit-from-the-public-eye, etc. and henceforth hiding the espenses, to obfuscate the hush-money payment) no longer stands.
Insta-popcorn.
I'm afraid it's not that easy.
The prosecution did put Jeffrey McConney the Trump controller on the stand so they were probably pretty aware of what he would say.
They are going to use McConney to try to corroborate. Michael Cohen. The prosecution is saying there were hush money payments and then later business records. The people who knew about the hush money payments were Trump, Pecker, and Cohen. Possibly Alan Weisselberg knew. The people who knew what the business records were for were Trump, Cohen and Weisselberg.
Mcconnie said a couple things that the Trump lawyers will have to deal with somehow.
He never saw a legal retainer for Michael Cohen.
He was told by Alan Weisselberg the money was for reimbursing Cohen and he was going to be reimbursed for $420,000 not just the $130,000 paid to Daniels.
Both he and Weisselberg took notes that explained how they got to this number.
So yes, McConney directly told the accounting department what to write on the records, but he basically was doing his Alan Weisselberg told him.
OK. This is Robert Gouveia. I've seen him on Twitter.
The discussion of the reimbursement and the notes starts about 33:00 minutes in
51:22 is where Trump's lawyer gets to ask him about the notes.
(This guy's acting is killing me.)