No, I noted that there are portions of the Talmud that are “horrifically” bad, and portions that are indeed reasonable commentary and historic notes, which is also true.

If you like, I’ll add that there are probably sections that are incorrect, but not as bad.

We have now covered all three cases.

I do not believe the books are generally worth knowing except as a means of showing errancy or perhaps occasionally looking up a historical context, and I have other things to do with my time. There’s too much to learn about the Bible itself. Doesn’t mean I’m not going to try and be objective.