We may never be able to verify certain crimes. We won't have this girl's clothes with Schumer's sperm on them. I don't think it drags us down, but it can be filed away as "highly probable" and will take time and effort to prove true.
There are other ways to check. Look at ALL the evidence, witnesses and circumstances. Who would benefit? Is it in their character? Does it make sense? What is the timeline? Were there any "coincidences"? Is it plausible? If it's a "fact checker", it's usually a lie. In fact, when I'm researching something, I look at what the "fact checkers" have to say. If they say it's false, it's likely true.
Use your powers of logic, deduction, discernment and intuition to come to a conclusion.
We have tons of solid evidence that the Clot Shot kills and maims. Yet it is still being given today.
sure, I think he is a paedo, but if the story cannot be verified, it drags us down. let them pass this along on pdw.
We may never be able to verify certain crimes. We won't have this girl's clothes with Schumer's sperm on them. I don't think it drags us down, but it can be filed away as "highly probable" and will take time and effort to prove true.
There are other ways to check. Look at ALL the evidence, witnesses and circumstances. Who would benefit? Is it in their character? Does it make sense? What is the timeline? Were there any "coincidences"? Is it plausible? If it's a "fact checker", it's usually a lie. In fact, when I'm researching something, I look at what the "fact checkers" have to say. If they say it's false, it's likely true.
Use your powers of logic, deduction, discernment and intuition to come to a conclusion.
We have tons of solid evidence that the Clot Shot kills and maims. Yet it is still being given today.