The main point for me is that, according to Vostok Ice Core Data from Antarctica, CO2 rises only after the temperature has increased. It increases some centuries later. Now, you will find lots of mealy-mouthed explanations as to why that doesn't matter but it still seems important to me.

Are CO2 levels high now? Well, they are just over 400ppm now but they have been around 7,000ppm in the past. If levels drop below 200ppm then plants will struggle to grow so the world will have no food. Note: The scale is logarithmic. the warming increase from 100ppm to 200ppm is the same as between 400pppm and 800ppm.

This is an interesting montage. The graph on the left is from NASA and it shows how big the temperature correction is. (The data will be a few years out of date now because i gave up following the climate hoax some years ago!) Note how they increase modern temperatures entirely arbitrarily then tell us that the increase is all real!

The other pictures show how we do not have a uniform set of thermometers across the world so calculating an average temperature is subject to all kinds of manipulation.

The bottom-right chart shows that most warming occurs where thermometers are fewest. How strange is that?

Another interesting picture shows that over 10,000 years in Greenland, temperatures have been falling while CO2 has been increasing.

Then there was the famous "hockey stick graph" from Mann, Bradley and Hughes (1998, 1999). One of their tree ring curves went down at the end of the graph showing that tree rings do not work very well as current temperature indicators so they just did not show that on the chart. The real question is: If tree rings don't work now, why do we think they work for the past?

They also missed out the Medieval Warm Period which was warmer than now, Mann was very coy about his correlation statistics (R-squared valued) and his data was not initially available for anyone to check it. Oh, and he did not get his Principal Component Analysis exactly right. It does show a current warming spike, though, so it was pushed for all it was worth.

Just like the plandemic scare, if you were an expert on the subject but did not go along with the approved narrative then you could lose your job or not be able to get any research funding.

What is the hoax for? Follow the money. Carbon Credits etc. What better to run the Globalist New World Order than a Global tax of some sort. The climate hoax provides an excuse to tax everyone in the world and to have the funds administered by a global organisation.