You conveniently never addressed my real points about logic and statistics.
In my opinion, you never articulated this in any way. You just said the words. You didn't make any detailed argument about what you consider logic and statistics. And by detailed, I mean you didn't provide any details. At all.
You should note: I don't mean arguments as in bickering. I mean argument as in making a case for a certain point of view.
I don't really think that the onus is on others to disprove your claims, but rather, the onus is on your to lay out the basis for your claims and prove or uphold them.
I was never abusive though.
Matter of opinion. You were board-line abusive to litho, imo.
Most of what everyone has been saying is opinion, especially you.
Yep. Although I don't know if I agree with the especially part. I think I've written more in this particular post than others (excluding perhaps you), but yes, I'm sharing my opinion on things.
Ok, if you're saying i didn't start statistics class 101 in this thread then your right.... But i think i have the right to say facepalm now. When its something this obvious (at least to me) I would say the burden of proof is on the guy who is shitting on the post not the other way around.
Really the issue is that no one wants to back up their attacks with data and its not like I'm making a scotty mar 10 video....so of course I'm gonna get the down votes from the people who just have a good sense of whats popular.
I can see it from their point of view too though.
To them its obvious that what i presented is cringe.
To me its obvious that their point of view is jaded and blue pilled.
Really the issue is that no one wants to back up their attacks with data
You didn't back up your assertions with any data. All you said was "Trump said that Barron "is 17".
so of course I'm gonna get the down votes from the people who just have a good sense of whats popular.
Again, projecting and imaging that you know what people are thinking.
if you have a theory, then I suggest you actually present it with some actual data, research, reasoning, and argument, instead of complaining that others don't accept your idea, making excuses and asserting that you know what other people are thinking, feeling and what motivates them.
The vast majority of response on the actual post was clear and vocal. The post didn't attract very many upvotes, despite being stickied.
If you have a theory, then present it with actual data, research, reasoning, and argument. You might not like what you get back, but at least then you'll be participating like a critical thinker instead of just complaining and blaming everyone else.
Dude....Read everything I've said in this post again please. I think I've made my points clearly. If people think hes trolling by clearly saying "hes 17" when he is obviously actually 18 at the time trump said it then it's their right to hold that opinion. For everyone else who ever saw an air Q or any other basic comm that would be totally missed by normies, and THAT made their day but they didn't like this one for whatever reason; well I think that they hold some cognitive dissonance. I really think most people were on here were stoked to see this post......I mean really, the guys channel on rumble has almost 500k subscribers and his video got over 10k like and only 80 dislikes. I didn't even wanna bring this point up because its outside of the community....But honestly dude i think some of us are getting out of touch here maybe you included. There are a lot of good researches on here who have a lot more time than me. I was really hoping that some of them would have a really strong argument as to why this was true or false. We didn't get that. We got a lot of 8th grade style "thats retarded" comments instead. We should do better....
In my opinion, you never articulated this in any way. You just said the words. You didn't make any detailed argument about what you consider logic and statistics. And by detailed, I mean you didn't provide any details. At all.
You should note: I don't mean arguments as in bickering. I mean argument as in making a case for a certain point of view.
I don't really think that the onus is on others to disprove your claims, but rather, the onus is on your to lay out the basis for your claims and prove or uphold them.
Matter of opinion. You were board-line abusive to litho, imo.
Yep. Although I don't know if I agree with the especially part. I think I've written more in this particular post than others (excluding perhaps you), but yes, I'm sharing my opinion on things.
Ok, if you're saying i didn't start statistics class 101 in this thread then your right.... But i think i have the right to say facepalm now. When its something this obvious (at least to me) I would say the burden of proof is on the guy who is shitting on the post not the other way around.
Really the issue is that no one wants to back up their attacks with data and its not like I'm making a scotty mar 10 video....so of course I'm gonna get the down votes from the people who just have a good sense of whats popular.
I can see it from their point of view too though.
To them its obvious that what i presented is cringe.
To me its obvious that their point of view is jaded and blue pilled.
You didn't back up your assertions with any data. All you said was "Trump said that Barron "is 17".
Again, projecting and imaging that you know what people are thinking.
if you have a theory, then I suggest you actually present it with some actual data, research, reasoning, and argument, instead of complaining that others don't accept your idea, making excuses and asserting that you know what other people are thinking, feeling and what motivates them.
The vast majority of response on the actual post was clear and vocal. The post didn't attract very many upvotes, despite being stickied.
If you have a theory, then present it with actual data, research, reasoning, and argument. You might not like what you get back, but at least then you'll be participating like a critical thinker instead of just complaining and blaming everyone else.
Dude....Read everything I've said in this post again please. I think I've made my points clearly. If people think hes trolling by clearly saying "hes 17" when he is obviously actually 18 at the time trump said it then it's their right to hold that opinion. For everyone else who ever saw an air Q or any other basic comm that would be totally missed by normies, and THAT made their day but they didn't like this one for whatever reason; well I think that they hold some cognitive dissonance. I really think most people were on here were stoked to see this post......I mean really, the guys channel on rumble has almost 500k subscribers and his video got over 10k like and only 80 dislikes. I didn't even wanna bring this point up because its outside of the community....But honestly dude i think some of us are getting out of touch here maybe you included. There are a lot of good researches on here who have a lot more time than me. I was really hoping that some of them would have a really strong argument as to why this was true or false. We didn't get that. We got a lot of 8th grade style "thats retarded" comments instead. We should do better....