It's hardly a new idea that AI might destroy civilization or even end life on Earth. Michael A. Garrett has put together a paper that suggests AI might be the "Great Filter" that civilizations must go through to survive long enough to become space-faring beyond their own solar systems.
Q flat-out states that US Military = SAVIOR of mankind (drop 114; see below) and You are the SAVIORs of mankind. (drop 2442). I can't help but wonder if the Q team is referencing AI dangers as well as the Cabal.
Artificial intelligence (AI) has progressed at an astounding pace over the last few years. Some scientists are now looking towards the development of artificial superintelligence (ASI) — a form of AI that would not only surpass human intelligence but would not be bound by the learning speeds of humans.
But what if this milestone isn’t just a remarkable achievement? What if it also represents a formidable bottleneck in the development of all civilizations, one so challenging that it thwarts their long-term survival?
This idea is at the heart of a research paper I recently published in Acta Astronautica. Could AI be the universe’s “great filter” — a threshold so hard to overcome that it prevents most life from evolving into space-faring civilizations?
The potential for something to go badly wrong is enormous, leading to the downfall of both biological and AI civilizations before they ever get the chance to become multi-planetary. For example, if nations increasingly rely on and cede power to autonomous AI systems that compete against each other, military capabilities could be used to kill and destroy on an unprecedented scale. This could potentially lead to the destruction of our entire civilization, including the AI systems themselves.
114
Nov 05, 2017 11:56:55 PM EST
Anonymous ID: FAkr+Yka No. 148186256
US Military = SAVIOR of mankind.
We will never forget.
Fantasy land.
God save us all.
Q
2442
Nov 06, 2018 4:16:21 PM EST
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 000000 No. 422
History is being made.
You are the SAVIORs of mankind.
Nothing will stop what is coming.
Nothing.
Q.
I have meant to send a message to the MODs about downvote(s) that it becomes an “interactive” process instead of just being a downvote, such as a “reason(s) for the downvote to “stimulate” a friendly (hopefully) discussion- since there are always “two sides to a story/point of view which the reader(s) and the downvoters can choose to believe or not.
That's a great idea.