Not really. The problem is, just like with HAARP or any other adjacent issue, there are sprinkles of truth to the phenomena. However, like clockwork, the "tard" level comes when Internet researchers rely on their pet Internet "experts" (too often its easy to find CIA or other suspect connections, Dane Wigington is a great example) over blow the issue by 1000X, which they KNOW is an emotionally charged issue that non-experts in alt media public will uncritically accept as they are already prepped for the paranoid worldview that "they" are out to kill us in every domain.
Sure, tard is an unnecessarily insulting label. But the stubbornness in the absence of expertise and hard evidence ("whistleblowers" and the usual suspects "experts" don't meet these standards) doesn't reflect well on one's abilities to conduct rational research and argumentation.
You are correct about sprinkles of truth. That is exactly how the deep state have controlled the narrative for so long. I don't doubt for a minute that the post with all the downvotes is truthful about jet engines. However, that certainly doesn't mean that the deep state is not doing nefarious things to our air with these same jets. Speaking for myself, I don't believe a single thing the so called experts say anymore. I do not blame people one bit for questioning what we are seeing with our own eyes, and demanding proof.
Not really. The problem is, just like with HAARP or any other adjacent issue, there are sprinkles of truth to the phenomena. However, like clockwork, the "tard" level comes when Internet researchers rely on their pet Internet "experts" (too often its easy to find CIA or other suspect connections, Dane Wigington is a great example) over blow the issue by 1000X, which they KNOW is an emotionally charged issue that non-experts in alt media public will uncritically accept as they are already prepped for the paranoid worldview that "they" are out to kill us in every domain.
Sure, tard is an unnecessarily insulting label. But the stubbornness in the absence of expertise and hard evidence ("whistleblowers" and the usual suspects "experts" don't meet these standards) doesn't reflect well on one's abilities to conduct rational research and argumentation.
You are correct about sprinkles of truth. That is exactly how the deep state have controlled the narrative for so long. I don't doubt for a minute that the post with all the downvotes is truthful about jet engines. However, that certainly doesn't mean that the deep state is not doing nefarious things to our air with these same jets. Speaking for myself, I don't believe a single thing the so called experts say anymore. I do not blame people one bit for questioning what we are seeing with our own eyes, and demanding proof.