Ive investigated many of those cases. It isn't hard to prove. The bigger problem was the monumental efforts of denominated churches and some government bodies to cover it up. They've infiltrated everything. Coached children are easy to spot during whatnare called the CARES interview. When it's real there is always physical evidence. Most of my cases included DNA evidence. The others usually included an admission from the offender. They have become easier to spot also with the publishing of the symbolism that used to be considered not releasable. There is almost always the symbolism with it too.
Isn't all of the digital evidence now brought forward and used as evidence to prosecute? For example, cellphone calls, text messages, emails, social media posts, etc? Not to mention GPS location data! So have we moved beyond "he said, she said"?
They better be right when they convict and not have some lying child being coached by an evil mother.
Ive investigated many of those cases. It isn't hard to prove. The bigger problem was the monumental efforts of denominated churches and some government bodies to cover it up. They've infiltrated everything. Coached children are easy to spot during whatnare called the CARES interview. When it's real there is always physical evidence. Most of my cases included DNA evidence. The others usually included an admission from the offender. They have become easier to spot also with the publishing of the symbolism that used to be considered not releasable. There is almost always the symbolism with it too.
Isn't all of the digital evidence now brought forward and used as evidence to prosecute? For example, cellphone calls, text messages, emails, social media posts, etc? Not to mention GPS location data! So have we moved beyond "he said, she said"?