She's nuts and what she says speaks for itself. She's hardly the first whackjob Marxist professor to go on a public rant like this after getting arrested for trespass, disorderly, or whatever else.
I understand the skepticism. I have no idea who Amy Mek is. I don't care. Like I said, the evidence of this lady's own words speaks for itself. She's talking as if education is an entitlement. It's not. She's talking as if these kids will be homeless if not in college. They won't be. She's talking about gov't money like a typical bureaucrat: use it or lose it, that is, there's no concept of trying to save money or spend it wisely so the taxpayer doesn't have to foot such a large bill in the first place, because in her mind, it's gov't money and since it's in the budget, it must be spent. Her words themselves tell you who she is and how she thinks. She's the kind of whackjob who's teaching kids pure Marxism.
She's nuts and what she says speaks for itself. She's hardly the first whackjob Marxist professor to go on a public rant like this after getting arrested for trespass, disorderly, or whatever else.
I understand the skepticism. I have no idea who Amy Mek is. I don't care. Like I said, the evidence of this lady's own words speaks for itself. She's talking as if education is an entitlement. It's not. She's talking as if these kids will be homeless if not in college. They won't be. She's talking about gov't money like a typical bureaucrat: use it or lose it, that is, there's no concept of trying to save money or spend it wisely so the taxpayer doesn't have to foot such a large bill in the first place, because in her mind, it's gov't money and since it's in the budget, it must be spent. Her words themselves tell you who she is and how she thinks. She's the kind of whackjob who's teaching kids pure Marxism.