There is no such thing as "Dual-Loyalty". Their loyalty is only to one place, and it ain't here.
(media.greatawakening.win)
💊 RED PILL 💊
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (95)
sorted by:
No, you saw me speaking about specific scenarios. Why you chose to respond here without the context of what was said is unknown.
Because I read the Q drops and Protocols of Zion, I then reconciled and discerned for myself who leads the Cabal and who Q was speaking about.
u/#q939
u/#q944
Q confirmed Hitler was a puppet of the NWO, yes. Q never mentioned Natürliche Wirtschaftsordnung, definitely didn't say NAZI's created it. He responded to an anon that posted it as seen above. This is called "whataboutism".
This is the ever-present "Not-all-jews" argument. It's boring and pedantic. The head of the Cabal lies in Israel. Which is why Israel was saved for last, and you are watching them be exposed in real-time world-wide, while the World is Watching.
For Some of them to want us divided, their has to be a THEM to begin with.
u/#q1574
Interesting, that on a post about Jews in the congress making laws to remove freedom of speech from Americans this is your line of questioning, and not why these (((dual-loyalties))) even have the opportunity to make laws for us.
I wonder, if the person in the picture was wearing the MILITARY UNIFORM of any other NATION while in our congress making laws would you be here questioning why I am so mean to the poor people of said nation?
I bet not.
Q is asking what the N in NWO stands for, people seem to be pointing to Nazi World Order, and then the anon mentions the NWO National Economic Order.
Q quotes this anon, why? Why would Q quote the anon if it wasn’t relevant then say “Went to deep, attempted pullback, not ready.”
As a legendary Q researcher, and certainly not a division fag muh joo shill, why would Q do this?
So you say this is “whataboutisim” but then run to “saving Israel for last” as if that could only be interpreted one way. Is Q saving Israel for last to be exposed, or is he SAVING Israel from the Kabal for last? The Final Battle.
I came to this post because I’ve seen you come out of the 2 year slumber recently, always ramming against the muh joo, but NEVER once promoting unity, so I combed through some of your posts and decided I would put this test out for you.
And your last point I totally agree with, makes me sick the ones who have superiority complexes and claim to be “gods chosen ones” this is a sick line of thought indeed.
However I got what I needed to know
You refuse to acknowledge that when Q says WWG1WGA he means it, this makes you come off as more of a division fag if anything.
“For Some of them to want us divided, there has to be a THEM to begin with.”
So the baby being pushed out of the vagina of some random lady in Israel is THEM by default in your eyes?
Can you elaborate more on who is dis included of your interpretation of
WHERE WE GO 1 WE GO “ALL”?
OSS:
GQD_ :
Everyone pay very close attention this. Today I posted about how Congress was planning to pass a bill to defund our DoD, NSC and State Department if we didn't give unlimited money and arms to Israel, I posted about how congress is passing laws to curb free speech so we can't point out Dual-loyalties from a Jew wearing an IDF uniform in the US Congress, and lastly, a shit-fuck-ton of evidence that a MOSSAD/IDF ring is operating on US Soil and attacking American Citizens, almost to the point of killing them.
And after all that, this "totally-organic-poster" is only interested in protecting Jews and claiming I am a Muh Joo shill for mentioning these things. After you get a laugh out of this, go to the following website and look where these same people have posted the same thing 15,000 times.
https://qresear.ch/?q=+OSS+
I guess if the Jews stopped doing so much shit for me to talk about I wouldn't talk about them as much.
No, I agree with what YOU say, for the most part.
Now why can’t you agree with what I said?
Is it because you want more DIVISION?
It seems like you popped up around here at such a convenient time!
Another one of those cohencidences!
Sounds like somebody needs to brush up on their Q POSTINGS, considering you are such a legendary researcher and all!
I suggest 933-944 for start, try these other fun searxh terms like HITLER, WW2, NAZI, ANTIFA, SOROS, MERKEL, WHO FUNDS NOW, etc
Perhaps you should
u/#q938
Q quoted some relevant messages by others in order to correct them.
The Natürliche Wirtschaftsordnung, or Natural Economic Order, was not directly related to the Nazi regime or its economic policies. In fact, the theories of Silvio Gesell, the proponent of the Natürliche Wirtschaftsordnung, were generally at odds with Nazi economic principles.
Silvio Gesell's ideas were based on anti-capitalist and anti-monopoly principles. He advocated for monetary reforms aimed at creating a more equitable distribution of wealth and preventing the accumulation of capital through interest or speculation. Gesell's theories were aligned more with socialist and leftist ideologies rather than with the far-right nationalism and authoritarianism of the Nazi regime.
However, it's worth noting that during the 1920s and early 1930s, there were some fringe elements within the Nazi Party who flirted with various economic theories, including some anti-capitalist and anti-Semitic ones. These elements were eventually marginalized as the Nazi Party solidified its power, and Nazi economic policy became characterized by state control, militarization, and exploitation rather than any adherence to theories like Gesell's.
Overall, while there may have been some tangential connections or overlaps in the ideological landscape of the time, the Natürliche Wirtschaftsordnung was not a significant influence on Nazi economic policies, which were largely driven by the regime's pursuit of autarky, militarization, and racial ideology.
This is called Usury. Tell me again, which group of people are specifically known for controlling money supply through these methods?
So are you saying it's not an important question to be presented?
No, I said "It's boring and pedantic."
So how do we shine light on the evil(synagogue of Satan) while also ensure those that aren't evil(Jews) don't suffer from the hands of those that wish to see all Jews die.
I don't wish to see anyone to die, and that is not an answer I have for you. I could care no more or no less about "all jews" than "all Mexicans" or "all Pakistani" I care about the evil perpetrated by the state of Israel directly and through her proxies. The evil done by their intelligence agencies and through their deceitful media control.
God will decide their judgement, both those that were involved and those that helped hide it with statements meant to muddy the waters like "not all Jews."
My job and yours is to point it out. I find it interesting that when I make points about Mexican Drug cartels, I don't get an endless string of sock-puppet accounts shouting "not all mexicans." Or if I bring up Imran Awan I don't get "Not all Pakistani"
What did Jesus say about folk calling themselves Jews? Will liars enter the Kingdom of Heaven? Every man chooses his own fate. Jesus or death. They will have what they choose.
Good post. Folk will have to renew their thinking about many systems.
Kek, I thought I was being pretty nice. Doing my best to not give anyone a chance to ban me.
So you agree then as legendary Q researcher, that Hitler was a bloodline puppet, perhaps Roth?
And that World War 2 was fought and funded by the same entity, pitting brother against brother, to create the current state of Israel?