There is no such thing as "Dual-Loyalty". Their loyalty is only to one place, and it ain't here.
(media.greatawakening.win)
💊 RED PILL 💊
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (95)
sorted by:
Hello OP I’ve seen some of your claims against mods here, and your complaints of downvote attacks against you for speaking the truth etc.
I agree a foreign nation attacking us is a war crime.
However reading some of your posts you put a lot of focus into the Jewish deep state.
Was just wondering, seeing what Q has specifically told us about Hitler, World War 2, Nazis/Antifa, Merkel, Germany, etc
Sure Q has blasted Israel/Netanyahu/Mossad etc
But Q has also blasted Hitler as being a bloodline family puppet, in fact Q tells us the Nazis CREATED the NWO (Natürliche Wirtschaftsordnung, the National Economic Order) Q tells us the Nazis never went away, that they’d simply rebranded as the “modern day left”.
How do you refer or label the “Jewish Deep State”, corrupt Kabal, without directly demonizing say, a normal Jew who is not part of this system?
As you know as a legendary Q researcher one of the main sentiments of the Q plan is they want us DIVIDED.
WWG - 1 - WGA (ALL. WORLD WIDE.)
No, you saw me speaking about specific scenarios. Why you chose to respond here without the context of what was said is unknown.
Because I read the Q drops and Protocols of Zion, I then reconciled and discerned for myself who leads the Cabal and who Q was speaking about.
u/#q939
u/#q944
Q confirmed Hitler was a puppet of the NWO, yes. Q never mentioned Natürliche Wirtschaftsordnung, definitely didn't say NAZI's created it. He responded to an anon that posted it as seen above. This is called "whataboutism".
This is the ever-present "Not-all-jews" argument. It's boring and pedantic. The head of the Cabal lies in Israel. Which is why Israel was saved for last, and you are watching them be exposed in real-time world-wide, while the World is Watching.
For Some of them to want us divided, their has to be a THEM to begin with.
u/#q1574
Interesting, that on a post about Jews in the congress making laws to remove freedom of speech from Americans this is your line of questioning, and not why these (((dual-loyalties))) even have the opportunity to make laws for us.
I wonder, if the person in the picture was wearing the MILITARY UNIFORM of any other NATION while in our congress making laws would you be here questioning why I am so mean to the poor people of said nation?
I bet not.
Q is asking what the N in NWO stands for, people seem to be pointing to Nazi World Order, and then the anon mentions the NWO National Economic Order.
Q quotes this anon, why? Why would Q quote the anon if it wasn’t relevant then say “Went to deep, attempted pullback, not ready.”
As a legendary Q researcher, and certainly not a division fag muh joo shill, why would Q do this?
So you say this is “whataboutisim” but then run to “saving Israel for last” as if that could only be interpreted one way. Is Q saving Israel for last to be exposed, or is he SAVING Israel from the Kabal for last? The Final Battle.
I came to this post because I’ve seen you come out of the 2 year slumber recently, always ramming against the muh joo, but NEVER once promoting unity, so I combed through some of your posts and decided I would put this test out for you.
And your last point I totally agree with, makes me sick the ones who have superiority complexes and claim to be “gods chosen ones” this is a sick line of thought indeed.
However I got what I needed to know
You refuse to acknowledge that when Q says WWG1WGA he means it, this makes you come off as more of a division fag if anything.
“For Some of them to want us divided, there has to be a THEM to begin with.”
So the baby being pushed out of the vagina of some random lady in Israel is THEM by default in your eyes?
Can you elaborate more on who is dis included of your interpretation of
WHERE WE GO 1 WE GO “ALL”?
The Natürliche Wirtschaftsordnung, or Natural Economic Order, was not directly related to the Nazi regime or its economic policies. In fact, the theories of Silvio Gesell, the proponent of the Natürliche Wirtschaftsordnung, were generally at odds with Nazi economic principles.
Silvio Gesell's ideas were based on anti-capitalist and anti-monopoly principles. He advocated for monetary reforms aimed at creating a more equitable distribution of wealth and preventing the accumulation of capital through interest or speculation. Gesell's theories were aligned more with socialist and leftist ideologies rather than with the far-right nationalism and authoritarianism of the Nazi regime.
However, it's worth noting that during the 1920s and early 1930s, there were some fringe elements within the Nazi Party who flirted with various economic theories, including some anti-capitalist and anti-Semitic ones. These elements were eventually marginalized as the Nazi Party solidified its power, and Nazi economic policy became characterized by state control, militarization, and exploitation rather than any adherence to theories like Gesell's.
Overall, while there may have been some tangential connections or overlaps in the ideological landscape of the time, the Natürliche Wirtschaftsordnung was not a significant influence on Nazi economic policies, which were largely driven by the regime's pursuit of autarky, militarization, and racial ideology.
This is called Usury. Tell me again, which group of people are specifically known for controlling money supply through these methods?