yeah, but I think the real reason for him saying this is also to point out religious affiliation. for a religion that is only 3% of the population, there sure are a lot more than 3% of judges, politicians, professors, prosecutors, doctors, lawyers and doctors. are they represented by such a large margin in the infantry? is it really wrong to question this? I think most people in the audience are over looking the "dual citizenship" part.
yeah, but I think the real reason for him saying this is also to point out religious affiliation. for a religion that is only 3% of the population, there sure are a lot more than 3% of judges, politicians, professors, prosecutors, doctors, lawyers and doctors. are they represented by such a large margin in the infantry? is it really wrong to question this? I think most people in the audience are over looking the "dual citizenship" part.