A few points. Firstly, well done in attempting to look at the issue from different angles.

Secondly, let's realize that the concept of "cult" has been weaponized in the same way that "conspiracy theory' was weaponized by the CIA. The concept of "a cult" in it's modern usage was created and mainstream during the same period in the 1960's. It has been used to demonize any fringe religious group or thinking that the establishment, including the Church establishment, wanted to denigrate or sideline, by associating them with something like the Jim Jones group.

Thanks to careful manipulation, the modern word 'cult' unlike its origins, immediately elicits feelings of fear, danger, wrongfulness, strangeness, etc.

It's this sort of weaponization of non-establishment groups that precipitated and justified the slaughter at Waco of a fringe religious group.

The fact is, that the history of religion and indeed Christianity is peppered with all sorts of offshoots, groups and expressions (mystic and otherwise) that today people would label with the term 'cult', and in its modern use, it's not difficult to see how it is used to marginalize and attack any group that does not conform to the establishment.

When I realized that the Cabal was attacking Q and anons by projecting the label of "cult" on us, I did a deep dive into the terminology and its origins.

https://greatawakening.win/p/13zMwopq4c/i-am-a-proud-member-of-the-qanon/

Note that I wrote this and posted on Reddit in 2018, when 'qanon' was still something anons used to build the Q movement, and Q had not yet found it necessary to draw the distinction between Q and anons and "qanon".

The point is, it's important not to fall into the trap of simply putting something down by labeling it 'a cult'.

Another point, regarding theosophy, is that evil very often uses a mixture of truth and lies to deceive. The best deceits are those which have a very large portion of truth with a deceptive lie embedded within. The fact that Theosophy and Blavatsky, for example, talk about certain things does not mean that everything they talk about is a lie or satanic. Discernment is needed, but it has always been the provenance of the 'establishment' - in the case of Christianity, starting with the Vatican - to suppress anything that threatens their control and dominance by labeling it heresy or, in it's modern form 'cult'.

Regarding Flynn, as far as I know, I recall listening to his explanation of the prayer that it was something that his mum would recite when he was young. I know for some, even the association with that fringe group church founded by Prophet itself triggers a negative reaction, but the last thing the Awakening needs is religious extremism, and I think all anons should tread with care when stepping out to label someone as a satanist, or occult.

Christ himself came with a message that was completely unorthodox and wildly 'heretical' from the viewpoint of the contemporary religious establishment, a fact that should make any Christian believer wary of imposing the same sort of condemnation on others whose ideas they don't like or which appear to contradict what they think are "acceptable beliefs".

On another note, aside from this particular prayer that Flynn offered in a uniquely religious situation, do his other actions or message uphold the view that he is a satanist or occult worshiper? Personally, I don't think so.

The satanists are pretty easy to spot these days, because they are all out on the open: transhumanism (WEF), actual satanist 'churches', LGBTQPI, etc.