He may be all that you say. Butvhe is still correct in his assessment. Its not something that can't be duplicated if someone does the work. Being offended at his motivations doesn't change the truth. Intellectual honesty also requires that approach.
Sure. I made zero statement or claims about the content, although personally I agree with Jon Harold that Devolution does not require, and in fact in many ways contradicts the idea that DJT is Potus and CIC.
And I notice that Najadi and Johnson push that line really hard, which I think is actually misleading and not serving the community well.
Also, both claim that they are instruments of 'disclosure'.
Naturally, its a good thing to promulgate effective theories and ideas, and facts and information, but not giving credit where it is due taints the effectiveness.
Add 5% poison to a wholesome 95% nutritious source, and it can had adverse impacts.
He may be all that you say. Butvhe is still correct in his assessment. Its not something that can't be duplicated if someone does the work. Being offended at his motivations doesn't change the truth. Intellectual honesty also requires that approach.
Sure. I made zero statement or claims about the content, although personally I agree with Jon Harold that Devolution does not require, and in fact in many ways contradicts the idea that DJT is Potus and CIC.
And I notice that Najadi and Johnson push that line really hard, which I think is actually misleading and not serving the community well.
Also, both claim that they are instruments of 'disclosure'.
Naturally, its a good thing to promulgate effective theories and ideas, and facts and information, but not giving credit where it is due taints the effectiveness.
Add 5% poison to a wholesome 95% nutritious source, and it can had adverse impacts.