175 WTC 6, which was in between WTC 1 and Building 7. Huh. Will you look at that? Only the top floor was crushed by falling debris and fire, while building 7 which was much further away was totally destroyed. Pancake theory works, until it doesn't. Better buy that "sudden building collapse insurance"! (media.greatawakening.win) posted 106 days ago by nothingberg 106 days ago by nothingberg +177 / -2 52 comments download share 52 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
How come this building didn't collapse at freefall speed?
WTC 6 suffered immediate catastrophic damage.
Have you seen this?
https://projects.voanews.com/ground-zero/images/800x-wtc6_9-11_credit_u.s._navy_photo_by_chief_photographer_s_mate_eric_j._tilford.jpg
that's what a building damaged by normal means looks like.
The OP's claim that the only the roof of WTC 6 was damaged is false.
Well sure but which looks more damaged, this or building 7?