Biden, seemingly caught in the vice grip of November electoral calculus, is refusing even to acknowledge that we are already in World War III, let alone take the necessary measures to win it. As a result, our nation’s military, weapons and munitions production capacity, and its ability to engage with the cyberwarfare and disinformation emanating from Moscow and Beijing, are all woefully lacking.
So, they believe Biden is a failure, possibly worse than Buchanan (15). Note the panic. They have no feasible Biden replacement, because they need a War-president. Prolly a seasoned General. - they think.
“Defending” must no longer be the watchword of the day in Biden’s White House, but “winning.” Winning this increasingly kinetic global ideological war is our only way forward if liberal democracy is to prevail against Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping.
Cringe. Here the wardrums are naked. The idea is to change from 'defending' to 'winning' - i.e. attacking. The War-fronts are: Ukraine, Middle East, Taiwan and Sahel in North Africa.
So says
Mark Toth writes on national security and foreign policy.
OK,
Mark Toth - Formerly an economist and entrepreneur who has also worked in banking, insurance, publishing, and global commerce. He is a former board member of the World Trade Center, St. Louis, and has lived in U.S. diplomatic and military communities around the world, including London, Tel Aviv, Augsburg, and Nagoya. https://muckrack.com/mark-toth-1
No idea of Military Logistics or War History.
Also Jonathan Sweet has C-I-A written allover. Col. (Ret.) Jonathan Sweet served 30 years as a military intelligence officer and led the U.S. European Command Intelligence Engagement Division from 2012 to 2014. So, his purpose is to write narratives. 'Creating' intelligence.
Anyway, The plan is to defeat the so-called multipolar world, militarily and economically dominated by Russia and China and anchored by BRICS.
Oof.
Combined, the BRICS members encompass about 30% of the world's land surface and 45% of the global population. Brazil, Russia, India, and China are among the world's ten largest countries by population, area, and gross domestic product (GDP) nominal and by purchasing power parity.
I agree with a lot but the weapons production part. That is a flat out lie. Not that we could "win" against a coalition force consisting of BRICS and whoever is else wants to join the party, but that's what [they] want, isn't it?
This article is the view from the Neo-cons:
So, they believe Biden is a failure, possibly worse than Buchanan (15). Note the panic. They have no feasible Biden replacement, because they need a War-president. Prolly a seasoned General. - they think.
Cringe. Here the wardrums are naked. The idea is to change from 'defending' to 'winning' - i.e. attacking. The War-fronts are: Ukraine, Middle East, Taiwan and Sahel in North Africa.
So says
OK,
No idea of Military Logistics or War History.
Also Jonathan Sweet has C-I-A written allover. Col. (Ret.) Jonathan Sweet served 30 years as a military intelligence officer and led the U.S. European Command Intelligence Engagement Division from 2012 to 2014. So, his purpose is to write narratives. 'Creating' intelligence.
Anyway, The plan is to defeat the so-called multipolar world, militarily and economically dominated by Russia and China and anchored by BRICS.
Oof.
I dunno, wiki it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BRICS#:~:text=Combined%2C%20the%20BRICS%20members%20encompass,and%20by%20purchasing%20power%20parity.
So, now it is to pit USA against BOTH superpowers, AND 45% of the World's population? Because winning is the new watchword bro. Trust me bro.
Wonderful dying hegemonic rainbow unicorn farts coming from the Hill.
I agree with a lot but the weapons production part. That is a flat out lie. Not that we could "win" against a coalition force consisting of BRICS and whoever is else wants to join the party, but that's what [they] want, isn't it?
The US would lose to Russia on its own never mind a coalition.