Every cancer patient who is on an ok diet, has a few days to live and eats proper decarboxylated organic cannabis oil in high doses over a few months, has been successful at curing their cancer.
Look, this is what I have a problem with.
There are 8 billion humans on the planet.
I cannot deny that there isn't a benefit -- there may very well be -- but it is an incredible stretch with the amount of cancer in the world and unless you were God Himself you would never be able to see every single dietary choice, environment or the effects on consuming it.
It's not just smoking it or eating it that will help. RSO -- concentrated extracted compounds -- has the best record and following that path would likely yield better results.
There are people who are chronically high off their ass on pot, and they still get cancer. That means that it cannot just act as a cure-all, and that's the problem I have. It's irresponsible to treat it so adamantly as a cure, when cure is a tough word to even use with cancer even on a good day.
Whoa whoa... I never said smoking cannabis cures cancer, it doesn't. You can get super high on cannabis and not cure anything.
I said you have to eat high concentrations of quality organic cannabis oil in combination with a good diet. There is a huge difference. I recommend you do some reading. I've been researching and publishing books on this for a decade. I'm also friends with Rick Simpson, the number one cannabis healer in the world, so I have access to way more cannabis Intel than the average person.
Disclaimer: I was not the one who downvoted you, because I am hoping you're making your arguments in good faith.
You missed my point of concern as I live in an area that seems to have been taken over by pot smokers, growers and dealers:
By running with statements "cannabis cures cancer" without adding in more nuance, you're reinforcing people who use statements like that and then people like me have to deal with those excuses for my once-clean area smelling like pot and having litter all over the place from the munchies 24/7, when there is endless proof that smoking it does not yield such a response.
The initial post you made did not add that nuance, and so I had criticism there. You have since clarified more and I appreciate that.
I will maintain that due to throttling and misclassification that we do not have enough studies to definitively point to it as a primary factor of healing, however I also believe that there are benefits to it that absolutely could aid in recovery.
I will also maintain that it is always going to be difficult to say that cancer is "cured" due to the nature of it.
Look, this is what I have a problem with.
There are 8 billion humans on the planet.
I cannot deny that there isn't a benefit -- there may very well be -- but it is an incredible stretch with the amount of cancer in the world and unless you were God Himself you would never be able to see every single dietary choice, environment or the effects on consuming it.
It's not just smoking it or eating it that will help. RSO -- concentrated extracted compounds -- has the best record and following that path would likely yield better results.
There are people who are chronically high off their ass on pot, and they still get cancer. That means that it cannot just act as a cure-all, and that's the problem I have. It's irresponsible to treat it so adamantly as a cure, when cure is a tough word to even use with cancer even on a good day.
Whoa whoa... I never said smoking cannabis cures cancer, it doesn't. You can get super high on cannabis and not cure anything.
I said you have to eat high concentrations of quality organic cannabis oil in combination with a good diet. There is a huge difference. I recommend you do some reading. I've been researching and publishing books on this for a decade. I'm also friends with Rick Simpson, the number one cannabis healer in the world, so I have access to way more cannabis Intel than the average person.
Disclaimer: I was not the one who downvoted you, because I am hoping you're making your arguments in good faith.
You missed my point of concern as I live in an area that seems to have been taken over by pot smokers, growers and dealers:
By running with statements "cannabis cures cancer" without adding in more nuance, you're reinforcing people who use statements like that and then people like me have to deal with those excuses for my once-clean area smelling like pot and having litter all over the place from the munchies 24/7, when there is endless proof that smoking it does not yield such a response.
The initial post you made did not add that nuance, and so I had criticism there. You have since clarified more and I appreciate that.
I will maintain that due to throttling and misclassification that we do not have enough studies to definitively point to it as a primary factor of healing, however I also believe that there are benefits to it that absolutely could aid in recovery.
I will also maintain that it is always going to be difficult to say that cancer is "cured" due to the nature of it.