You are wrong in this. I was with the Party since its inception in 1972, and the quality of its spokesmen was generally high, and persisted for some presidential cycles. But I had to part ways in the 1990s after conducting an investigation of a major financial corruption event in the Washington state chapter of the Party. And during all this time, the anarchist faction was gaining influence over the direction of the party. Since they were opposed to government per se---even Constitutional government---there was no way they could connect with people who loved this country (and still can't). It has now degenerated into a boutique where personalities vie for followers.
So, a good and promising start, but stumbling and dissolution afterward.
You are wrong in this. I was with the Party since its inception in 1972, and the quality of its spokesmen was generally high, and persisted for some presidential cycles. But I had to part ways in the 1990s after conducting an investigation of a major financial corruption event in the Washington state chapter of the Party. And during all this time, the anarchist faction was gaining influence over the direction of the party. Since they were opposed to government per se---even Constitutional government---there was no way they could connect with people who loved this country (and still can't). It has now degenerated into a boutique where personalities vie for followers.
So, a good and promising start, but stumbling and dissolution afterward.