Because until someone provides some evidence to back up this claim, its simply a conspiracy theory. Note that this is not a fringe conspiracy site and thats why encourage anons to do a bit of digging and come up with some evidence before claiming all kind of things.
Okay, if you are confirming it then I guess it must be true. They don't use barium or anything other than good old cloud-seeding shit. No sarcasm: It could be just more high flying planes that fly in the 'always persistent trails' section of the Appleman chart. They could be drones for all anyone knows. Something is up with the persistent trails though. I will stand by that.
Okay, if you are confirming it then I guess it must be true.
Huh? What did I confirm? If this is supposed to be sarcasm, I will ignore it and address your actual content:
Something is up with the persistent trails though. I will stand by that.
So what you are saying is that there are two different kinds of trails and the persistent trails are very different than the ones that evaporate in seconds and these persistent trails are caused by something nefarious.
Because until someone provides some evidence to back up this claim, its simply a conspiracy theory. Note that this is not a fringe conspiracy site and thats why encourage anons to do a bit of digging and come up with some evidence before claiming all kind of things.
You made the claim. How do you know there are no metal aerosols in "geoengineering?"
I am simply showing you what the documents available on the subject says.
They are still proposals
They include aerosols like SO2, HCL etc. (Again, these are probably very bad for us, but they simply dont explain "chemtrails")
Okay, if you are confirming it then I guess it must be true. They don't use barium or anything other than good old cloud-seeding shit. No sarcasm: It could be just more high flying planes that fly in the 'always persistent trails' section of the Appleman chart. They could be drones for all anyone knows. Something is up with the persistent trails though. I will stand by that.
Huh? What did I confirm? If this is supposed to be sarcasm, I will ignore it and address your actual content:
So what you are saying is that there are two different kinds of trails and the persistent trails are very different than the ones that evaporate in seconds and these persistent trails are caused by something nefarious.
Do you agree thats what you are saying?