Now that we have cleared the "without a shadow of doubt" confusion, do you agree that as anons, we need to have standards where there needs to be some evidence beyond "I used to see no persistent contrails, but now I see it all the time" ? Because persistent contrails have been document in books as far back as 50s.

As far as Tucker is concerned - (and this applies to Elon Musk and everyone else as well) - we have to always keep our ears open to see if he is showing his true colors.

But in this case, its even more simple. Tucker had a guest who talked about it and he indicated that he doesn't know about it and she even indicated that it falls into the conspiracy theory realm.

Nowhere in this exchange is there any. reason to believe. "Tucker is saying this is real". My read is that this is the first time Tucker heard about it.

Hence the discussions. I was hoping to see how much evidence anons can dig up that backs the claims of chemtrails. However all everyone is doing is getting offended that I said something that goes against their belief system