Libertarians Endorse Trump After Party Nominates "Gay Race Communist" Chase Oliver For President...
(resistthemainstream.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (70)
sorted by:
From what I've read, many libertarians (little l) align like MAGA but I really don't know much about the party... Cheers fren... ☕️☕️☕️
This is an oversimplification on my part, but the libertarian party is focused on:
-A strict & narrow interpretation of the Constitution and all the things that naturally come out of that (extremely limited: government, regulation, intrusion and kinetic foreign operations).
-A "if you're not hurting anyone else, it should be legal" approach to personal freedoms.
Needless to say, if the party was ever able to obtain any legitimacy, it would be a major threat to the Uniparty/Deep State/Cabal entrenchment. Hence all of the disrupters inserted into party leadership by the usual suspects over the years.
A smaller, but not insignificant issue is that the libertarian party has attracted a lot of anarchists which has further damaged the reputation of the party. There's a big difference between libertarians and anarchists, but the libertarian party is probably closer to anarchy than anything else.
Just my two cents.
Your two cents is greatly appreciated and helps me to better understand... Thank you for the information and I'll look deeper into it as I get the chance... Cheers fren... ☕️☕️☕️
I will say it again, the party has been taken over and since several of those Anarchists have been proven to be funded by the likes of Soros over the years, I have to come to the conclusion that, Libertarians are now being controlled by Globalists who are using them to destabilize the country. Many use the tenets like the liberals use lawfare. They do things that DO hurt others, they bully people, threaten people and try to get things accomplished via street force. My favorite sticking point on Libertarians is and has always been, LESS OF these stupid laws that hurt no one even if they may put the person doing the thing at risk if injury to self.. that should be the person's choice. An example? SEATBELTS! not wearing a seatbelt does nothing to up the chance of getting into an accident and causing harm to others, only yourself and only IF you get into an accident. This is just one very obvious law out there today that, should not be a thing.
Completely agree. No question that the party has been infiltrated repeatedly over the years. A coherent, well-run Libertarian party would be an enormous threat to the uniparty status quo and "they" just aren't going to allow that.