The doctrine is based on an older concept: The King can do no wrong, meaning, The King is inviolable to to be held harmless against all suits. These fall on his employees at all times.
Typically, this is an English thingy, and everywhere the King is the head of state. And old rag of a system, to quote a very nervous House-drinker.
At any rate, it should not apply to the Federal .gov, as the We the People and the States, who were created by the people, have created a servant to their interest. So, except may be for external purposes, the sovereign doctrine does not apply.
Rather the other way around. Hence, the privacy protections in the 5th and other amendments.
exactly.
The doctrine is based on an older concept: The King can do no wrong, meaning, The King is inviolable to to be held harmless against all suits. These fall on his employees at all times.
Typically, this is an English thingy, and everywhere the King is the head of state. And old rag of a system, to quote a very nervous House-drinker.
At any rate, it should not apply to the Federal .gov, as the We the People and the States, who were created by the people, have created a servant to their interest. So, except may be for external purposes, the sovereign doctrine does not apply.
Rather the other way around. Hence, the privacy protections in the 5th and other amendments.