A precedent was set today Anons! Moves and counter moves. This is a game of chess! If President Trump can be charged, prosecuted and convicted, then so too can the Bushes, Bidens, Clintons, and every Deep State swamp rat. They took the bait hook, line, and sinker. NOW THEY ALL LOSE!
(media.greatawakening.win)
- N C S W I C -
I really don't get this. They've always been able to be charged, prosecuted, and convicted. It's not like Trump being convicted passed some sort of law that changed their ability to be put on trial or convicted of crimes.
Charging President Trump is like Julius Caesar crossing the Rubicon. It is the point of no return from which all things are now possible. While the prosecution of a former President has technically been possible all along, it has been an unwritten rule that you just don't fucking do that. Its the line that politicians know you shouldn't cross lest you open pandoras box.
The democrats crossed that line first. Now when the Trump 24 administration goes after every deep state swamp rat, the democrats can't say shit about political persecution. They drew first blood.
Lol, of course they're going to say shit about it. You act like Democrats play fair or something.
Its not about what the Democrats do or think. Its about the court of public opinion. Had President Trump drained the swamp in 2017, it would have undoubtedly looked like a Banana Republic political persecution. The public perception has been shifted these past eight years. Ignore what the media and dems say in their echo chambers. The people of America see clearly what is going on with the witch hunt against President Trump.
The democrats will cry wolf about the upcoming swamp draining, but it will fall on deaf ears. They've burned all bridges and turned the public against them with their actions today.
We are in a place now where the People will not only approve of the Justice that is coming, they will DEMAND it.
Lawfag here - you are right and I don’t think many people understand this.
Our judicial system is based on precedent. The precedent has been set.
Ok, but what does that mean, practically speaking?
I'm not trying to be contentious, I just don't understand what people are thinking when they say this.
What precedent has been set? And what do you think that means?
Because, to me, it seems like people are thinking that it wasn't possible for presidents/ former presidents to be indicted, or arrested, or put on trial, or found guilty, or whatever precedent they're talking about, until now because Trump has gone through all of that.
Which makes no sense to me, because there was no precedent before Trump went through all of that. So obviously there didn't need to be a precedent set before any of those legal issues happened to Trump. So why would it be different for any other president/former president?
Again, I'm not trying to start a fight, I'm just trying to understand what people are thinking when they're talking about setting precedents.
I think it means more to the psychology of the American People rather than in legal terms. Now when President Trump actually goes in and drains the swamp, when the criminally depraved are detained, tried and face punishment, the People have seen the precedents that have been set and will not only support the President but demand action.
Eh, you give people much more credit than I do. I don't think that any of this is going to change the minds of the vast majority of the dem population.
It might sway a small portion of Independents. But I think by now, most people have chosen their side. Those with TDS won't change their minds no matter what, and those who love Trump already see how corrupt our government is.
Honestly, do you really believe that liberals are going to do a complete 180 and support Trump?