6
Madrashro 6 points ago +6 / -0

There’s not really a such thing as a “referral” from a private citizen (or law firm) to a prosecutorial body - that term is usually reserved for intragovermemt processes (the IRS recommending that the DOJ prosecute someone for tax fraud after an audit is a referral).

Not saying this is meaningless, just that it’s the same as if you or I wrote a letter to a prosecutors office and asked them to do something. They don’t have any obligation to do anything and likely won’t.

1
Madrashro 1 point ago +1 / -0

I didn’t mean drug possession charges are violent felonies, I meant that as two separate statements.

I agree that drug addiction is a complicated and serious problem and is less so a moral failing for the people afflicted by it. However, crack addiction drives people into crime - many, many thefts and crimes and spurred by addicts trying to steal to support their habits. They shouldn’t be allowed to own firearms for the good of everyone else.

All rights have limits. They lost theirs when they became addicted to a substance that erodes their sense of judgment, as tragic as it may be.

0
Madrashro 0 points ago +1 / -1

I don’t think someone addicted to crack should own a gun. I don’t think someone convicted of a violent felony should have the right to own a gun.

All constitutional rights have limits - we have a right to free speech, but (even at the time of adopting the 1st amendment), there were many examples of legal limits on speech, even making some speech (i.e. fraudulent speech) a crime.

6
Madrashro 6 points ago +6 / -0

Except that this isn’t an arrest, but a conviction after a trial?

2
Madrashro 2 points ago +2 / -0

That doesn’t mean you can stop trying or just ignore Him.

“But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you”

5
Madrashro 5 points ago +5 / -0

No disrespect, but some of us try to follow the King of Kings who disagrees with you on this issue.

0
Madrashro 0 points ago +1 / -1

Don’t be such a fudd. No one has carried the .45 in any appreciable numbers since the Vietnam war. In fact, the pipe hitters wanted the Glock 19 so badly they had to jump through crazy bureaucratic hoops to get it. They simply wanted the ultimate in ruggedness and reliability when their lives were on the line.

None of this is secret. You can also watch endless YouTube videos on the subject.

https://www.wearethemighty.com/articles/why-the-glock-is-the-sidearm-of-choice-in-special-operations/

https://www.19fortyfive.com/2022/08/glock-19-the-gun-the-fbi-delta-force-the-cia-and-army-special-forces-love/

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/the-clever-acquisition-how-u-s-army-special-forces-obtained-glock-19-pistols/ss-BB1lMNUx?ocid=a2hs

1
Madrashro 1 point ago +1 / -0

What do you have against 9mm? And Glock? The Glock 19 is the preferred handgun of most special forces for a reason.

4
Madrashro 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is your regular reminder that Q explicitly told us Posobiec is a Mossad plant

3
Madrashro 3 points ago +3 / -0

Like 70% is the population of NY state live in the NYC area so even if the rest is blood red it doesn’t matter

2
Madrashro 2 points ago +2 / -0

There is a heartbreaking number of homeless vets who deserve much better

view more: Next ›