Millions dead or badly injured from the jabs; skyrocketing violence from the millions of illegal aliens being purposefully imported; small businesses bankrupted wholesale during the scamdemic, and more: WHAT, exactly, are we and our families safe from?
I get that short and pithy makes this more impactful than it otherwise would be, but more detail would have given this post a lot more credibility.
I don't for a moment think Q is Superman, but I certainly DO think the massive US global intelligence apparatus has the ability to surveil pretty much everything in near-real time, and it doesn't seem impossible that some of that surveillance is devoted to protecting patriots involved in moving the plan forward. That would actually make good sense; in a war, you protect your assets when you can. Sometimes you can't, of course, sometimes even for strategic or other reasons, but NOT trying to protect the troops and other assets would be insane and counter-productive. That's why camo, helmets, vests, etc are issued, for instance.
What's your interpretation of this two-sentence drop?
I've always had trouble with this one.
Millions dead or badly injured from the jabs; skyrocketing violence from the millions of illegal aliens being purposefully imported; small businesses bankrupted wholesale during the scamdemic, and more: WHAT, exactly, are we and our families safe from?
I get that short and pithy makes this more impactful than it otherwise would be, but more detail would have given this post a lot more credibility.
Q is not Superman. Get out of the fantasy mindset. Q is talking about winning the war.
I don't for a moment think Q is Superman, but I certainly DO think the massive US global intelligence apparatus has the ability to surveil pretty much everything in near-real time, and it doesn't seem impossible that some of that surveillance is devoted to protecting patriots involved in moving the plan forward. That would actually make good sense; in a war, you protect your assets when you can. Sometimes you can't, of course, sometimes even for strategic or other reasons, but NOT trying to protect the troops and other assets would be insane and counter-productive. That's why camo, helmets, vests, etc are issued, for instance.
What's your interpretation of this two-sentence drop?