The following letter is the letter of the 33rd degree Freemason, Albert Pike. The letter was available in the British Museum Library of London until 1977.
The First World War
"The First World War must be brought about in order to permit the Illuminati to overthrow the power of the Czars in Russia and making that country a fortress of atheistic Communism. The divergences caused by the "agentur" [agents] of the Illuminati between the British and Germanic Empires will be used to foment this war. At the end of the war, Communism will be built and used to destroy the other governments and in order to weaken religions."
The Second World War
"The Second World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences between the Fascists and the political Zionists. This war must be brought about so that Nazism is destroyed and that the political Zionism be strong enough to institute a sovereign state of Israel in Palestine. During the Second World War, International Communism must become strong enough in order to balance Christendom, which would be then restrained and held in check until the time when we would need it for the final social cataclysm."
The Third World War
"The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by "agentur" of the "Illuminati" between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other.
Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion... We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil.
Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilazation, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in public view.
This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time."
Albert Pike must surely have been in the same group as other famous big-name deep staters i.e. Rothschild/Rockefeller/etc... right? Right?
That's an entirely different club. He speaks about destroying Zionism. Strange. From the way he talks, you'd think he'd be with them. That's a clue that there's more here.
In the 1903 book 'The Protocols of the Elders of Zion' in which (non-Jewish!) NWO deep staters discuss their plans for their political movement/weapon known as 'Zionism' in shocking detail. It talks about the steps they (the Zionists/Deep state) plan to form a league of nations, only to destroy it and start it over under the name United Nations. (history, anyone?)
WHO is unleashing the Nihilists and Atheists?
The answer to that question lies firmly in the "It will be your choice whether to know" Category. In other words, 'it's not impossible to figure out, the truth will be obvious to a sufficiently discerning intellect.'
The whole point is this: the group behind the plans mentioned in the above Albert Pike letter, and the group we call the ''NWO/Zionists/Deep State' DO NOT have the same agenda.
That one detail is a big Ducking deal.
So then WHO is the [Target]?
Think about what this all means.
"Deeper we go, the more unrealistic it all becomes."
"Everything is planned. Years."
WWG1WGA!
Different implies apart from one another; same implies together...few suggest groups and clubs to tempt each one of many together.
Ones consent to any suggestion by another implies submission/under-standing...a deeper state.
Meanwhile...ones adaption to perceivable implies ones growth...a higher state.
FAME, noun (Latin fama) - "to speak"...nature doesn't name anything; it's those within nature who suggest words within sound, which implies spell-craft.
a) CION, noun - "a young shoot, twig or sprout of a tree, or plant, or rather the cutting of a twig, intended for ingrafting on another stock; also, the shoot or slip inserted in a stock for propagation"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Cion
b) -ist (zionist) implies ones consent to suggested -ism (zionism)...if suggestion is the shoot and oneself the stock; then what does consent propagate?
c) What if propagation (inception towards death) generates resistance (life)?
How did "Albert Pike" stood out from them to be noticed by those not part of them?
Before that came the "Concert of Europe" based on the congress system aka few tempting many to walk (gradi) together (con).
The trick...nature sets itself apart (from whole into each partial)...those within tempt each other back together, which permits few to remain apart among many herded/collectivized together.
Strange glossary
I think free-will-of-choice is helping us to understand that the words we use and how we frame our circumstances, both determine our status in the world.
So when the term "deep state" is used, we in a sense speak and consent a higher power into existence. By identifying it as something beyond our control we've already lost the battle (will to fight). I think terms like "legacy media" are the way to break out of this kind of thinking.
TBH free-will-of-choice should have some sort of icon on their name. Lots of great word analysis in their post history...
No, using a term to describe the existence of what is hidden is not consenting its existence. Acknowledging the existence is imperative before we could tackle it.
The biggest trick by the devil was making the world believe it did not exist.
But once it's no longer hidden, it would be a form of consent though, aye?
For example, if a group of slaves decided to overthrow their master, they might identify him as "master" for a while, out of habit. But if they had success in achieving their freedom they would at some point no longer refer to him as "master".