Predicting experimental outcomes better than other theories would tend to indicate there is evidence to support a theory.
Evidence that is often later proven corrupted/misinterpreted/poorly tested/poor control groups ect. One might say you have Faith in your evidence until you don't.
Evidence that is often later proven corrupted/misinterpreted/poorly tested/poor control groups ect. One might say you have Faith in your evidence until you don't.
You can say that all you want. I disagree. A lot of people have faith in incorrect scientific theories but that's not the scientific method.