Supreme Court Ruling: State Sponsored Banks Can Disband from the Federal Reserve System and Issue Their Own Currency
(silverseek.com)
🔍 Notable
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (80)
sorted by:
Not sure that is true at all?
The US economy is run by highly educated, highly skilled, highly productive liberals living in diverse communities on the east and west coast. They pay large amounts of taxes into the federal government
The federal government spends that money on poor, ill, unproductive communities, who mostly vote republican. The liberals subsidise conservatives.
If those big federal programmes really were scaled back, and the money used to cut taxes liberals would get a lot richer, and conservatives would get a lot poorer. That is why Republicans find it so hard to deliver on promises to cut back federal programmes or reform Obamacare. If they did it is their own voter base who would suffer the hardest
I realise that isn't something people want to hear, but if you want to change the liberal domination of America you need to understand that the economy, and the federal government is entirely dependent on them
It’s also necessary to understand the purposes of “subsidization” loans and those welfare programs, and that many of those “highly skilled, highly educated, highly productive” liberals are using scale of economy to undercut formerly productive national industrial labor and streamline import and design activities, in joint operation with welfare and subsidies, to make
It’s not coincidence that we give “low interest loans” to dictators in all the countries we bomb. We do that so that we own them and can direct them to exploit their resources and people for our benefit. It’s the same thing here, just domestically. Get rid of the things that make it so that “nobody wants to work anymore”, which is a very real problem, and the problem may solve itself.
in large part, those liberals aren’t making anything anybody but the government wants. Take away that demand and what are they making? Is it counted as “subsidies” when the government signs a 180 billion dollar defense contract with Raytheon, who cuts 85 billion for “administration” and outsources the fabrication to China and the IT and call centers, and increasingly domestic HR, to India? Doubtful.
These things are not straight and simple as you’ve presented. There are Gordian knots of complexity with disrupted process after disrupted process across all facets of business and all supply chains and all operations and social interactions.
If subsidies were cut to say, Wal-Mart, it might not be that “supply chain businesses all go bankrupt, then what?” or “local consumers wouldn’t be able to buy necessities of life”, but if it was done gradually enough to transition, you might instead see local businesses come back into operation and other forms of formerly local, small, independent operations grow back up to fill the void.
Those welfare payments aren't going to highly productive highly skilled liberals on the east and west coast
They are going to conservative voters in the middle. Until Conservative voters can stand on their own 2 feet and not depend on liberals for hand outs the US isn't going to change
I’m arguing that they’re going to socialist voters and agitators in conservative states, crony businesses, and target price distortion markets.