The Supreme Court long ago determined that mere nudity, without the element of sexual gratification, it not a crime.
However, in this case I believe the perpetrator should be convicted of disturbing the peace, trespassing, and any other applicable offenses for being nude in a place not set aside for nudity, such as a nude beach or other destination. His approaching a minor while nude in public should be recognized as a crime worthy of earning a place on some appropriate list.
If I remember, the Supreme Court case was about a man, known by his family as a nudist, who pressured his young niece to slow dance with him in the nude. The Court found that there was lack of any evidence of sexual gratification, since all that occurred was dancing, and the man never had an erection. Borderline behavior yes, but slightly more innocent than not. I believe the niece was an experienced nudist as well.
The Supreme Court long ago determined that mere nudity, without the element of sexual gratification, it not a crime.
However, in this case I believe the perpetrator should be convicted of disturbing the peace, trespassing, and any other applicable offenses for being nude in a place not set aside for nudity, such as a nude beach or other destination. His approaching a minor while nude in public should be recognized as a crime worthy of earning a place on some appropriate list.
Does that go for walking naked down the street, or was the context related to magazines and similar?
If I remember, the Supreme Court case was about a man, known by his family as a nudist, who pressured his young niece to slow dance with him in the nude. The Court found that there was lack of any evidence of sexual gratification, since all that occurred was dancing, and the man never had an erection. Borderline behavior yes, but slightly more innocent than not. I believe the niece was an experienced nudist as well.