My friend's mom just got diagnosed with terminal glioblastoma (brain cancer). Knowing about Ivermectin, I've been looking up scholarly research articles to present to my friend so it doesn't just get brushed aside as a tinfoil-hat kind of snake-oil cure. Yes, there are promising signs for how Ivermectin can treat different types of cancers, including glioblastomas.
However, in researching doses, I came across an article about treating cancers with Doramectin (which, as the name suggests, is an anti-parasitic related to Ivermectin; however, Doramectin is almost exclusively used in veterinary medicine, whereas IVM is used in both humans and animals).
One line in the study (I looked up the full text through my local library) stood out to me:
[Doramectin] is absorbed more quickly, and has a longer lasting effect and plasma half‑life in animals compared with IVM ...
So I'm thinking, the elites were scared of Ivermectin getting publicized, not so much because they don't want us to get our dirty little hands on Ivermectin, but because Ivermectin is the gateway drug, so to speak, to other forms of related drugs that could be even more potent.
It’d be neat to find out what percentage of people stopped even buying the virus paradigm or believing in any vaccinations.