She has a valid point. If you caused a person to suffer, you should be punished, not live in oppulance. But first we need to get some balls and get past the strongly worded letters.
Fauci hasn't lost any rulings or had any judgments placed against him - even though he should - but he hasn't been ordered to pay anything, while Jones has been.
It's pretty simple, I thought she was smarter than that.
Right. It's not like she's going to go after him with her level of power and support. All the evidence is there and she'll wait for someone else to do it.
She has a valid point. If you caused a person to suffer, you should be punished, not live in oppulance. But first we need to get some balls and get past the strongly worded letters.
She doesn't have a valid point at all.
Jones lost a trial and is facing a ruling.
Fauci hasn't lost any rulings or had any judgments placed against him - even though he should - but he hasn't been ordered to pay anything, while Jones has been.
It's pretty simple, I thought she was smarter than that.
She most certainly does.
Just because Fauci hasn't yet been held to account for his egregious crimes which are so, so much worse that Alex Jones' blabbering about Sandy Hook!
I mean, come on!
No, you're missing the actual point, there is no connection. Until Fauci is tried and convicted, she doesn't have a point either.
Right. It's not like she's going to go after him with her level of power and support. All the evidence is there and she'll wait for someone else to do it.
your correct, innocent until proven, my bad