Yes, this is the obvious question. What if, for example, Hunter plead guilty years back, and Joe Biden himself plead guilty years back and both are going through the motions as part of the deal. In other words, strings by the Cabal cut, new strings (aka lawful and legal ones) applied from the White Hats?
I cannot help thinking about Dog Day and NoName, and how that was [apparently] set up for optical appearances but the reality was something else.
So, I'd keep my mind open that possibly something else was at play (although I doubt very much that charges against Hunter involved the gun charges. These are probably the very LEAST of any charges that could be brought against Hunter.
So if there were other charges and trials, it still would not necessary make the gun trial a show trial.
Rational thought says to me that the numbers here are coincidence, but reasonable doubt means I have to keep an open mind to the possibility that there is a lot I don't know.
That said, I prefer to take on the position of reasoned and rational acceptance of Q etc rather than the position of 'true believer' where I'll accept things because they speak to my emotions, rather than a solid, critical thinking perspective. In my view, there is PLENTY in the Q drops etc, where critical thinking actually accepts the total validity of the Q operation and Q+ without needing to adopt belief positions.
Doubting that the numbers here are somehow significant ( 6:3 6:11 + Gun text ) is NOT equivalent to doubting the Q operation. Just the opposite. Doubting the Q operation is the irrational choice, but questioning such things as the 'coincidences' here is not. IMO.
Thanks for the feedback. MUCH appreciated!
Yes, this is the obvious question. What if, for example, Hunter plead guilty years back, and Joe Biden himself plead guilty years back and both are going through the motions as part of the deal. In other words, strings by the Cabal cut, new strings (aka lawful and legal ones) applied from the White Hats?
I cannot help thinking about Dog Day and NoName, and how that was [apparently] set up for optical appearances but the reality was something else.
So, I'd keep my mind open that possibly something else was at play (although I doubt very much that charges against Hunter involved the gun charges. These are probably the very LEAST of any charges that could be brought against Hunter.
So if there were other charges and trials, it still would not necessary make the gun trial a show trial.
Rational thought says to me that the numbers here are coincidence, but reasonable doubt means I have to keep an open mind to the possibility that there is a lot I don't know.
That said, I prefer to take on the position of reasoned and rational acceptance of Q etc rather than the position of 'true believer' where I'll accept things because they speak to my emotions, rather than a solid, critical thinking perspective. In my view, there is PLENTY in the Q drops etc, where critical thinking actually accepts the total validity of the Q operation and Q+ without needing to adopt belief positions.
Doubting that the numbers here are somehow significant ( 6:3 6:11 + Gun text ) is NOT equivalent to doubting the Q operation. Just the opposite. Doubting the Q operation is the irrational choice, but questioning such things as the 'coincidences' here is not. IMO.