Basically it assumes that warming of the atmosphere (that they claim is happening) has to be due to X, Y, Z. (Where Z is CO2). Then they draw some graphs and prove that Z is the only one that correlates with the warming.
It entirely ignores the fact that there could be million other "causes" including natural earth cycles that might be causing the heating (assuming there is indeed a one degree increase in the last 100 years).
Almost all climate research is basically playing with this radiativee forcing to come up more correlations for what ever they want to demonize - like Nitrogen in Europe.
This paper, which to be looks like a parody of this concept, introduces another factor SO2 and proves that decrease in SO2 emissions can be correlated to the increase in radiative forcing.
This paper is literally exposing how ridiculous the whole concept is, but you gotta have the eyes to see the satire.
One of the scamiest fake concept in science.
Basically it assumes that warming of the atmosphere (that they claim is happening) has to be due to X, Y, Z. (Where Z is CO2). Then they draw some graphs and prove that Z is the only one that correlates with the warming.
It entirely ignores the fact that there could be million other "causes" including natural earth cycles that might be causing the heating (assuming there is indeed a one degree increase in the last 100 years).
Almost all climate research is basically playing with this radiativee forcing to come up more correlations for what ever they want to demonize - like Nitrogen in Europe.
This paper, which to be looks like a parody of this concept, introduces another factor SO2 and proves that decrease in SO2 emissions can be correlated to the increase in radiative forcing.
This paper is literally exposing how ridiculous the whole concept is, but you gotta have the eyes to see the satire.