Submission statement. This is a former open AI employee who was fired for leaking documents. From listening to the lecture last night and then again this morning, it's obvious that this guy's one of the bigger brains in ai, and he has been heavily involved in the past and the rather nebulous field of AI safety. As we listen to this lecture we can see clearly why Sam Altman went to the middle East and proposed them spending $14 trillion dollars on dedicated AI compute clusters. The race is on. General Nakasone is clearly there to manage this threat
Submission statement. This is a former open AI employee who was fired for leaking documents. From listening to the lecture last night and then again this morning, it's obvious that this guy's one of the bigger brains in ai, and he has been heavily involved in the past and the rather nebulous field of AI safety. As we listen to this lecture we can see clearly why Sam Altman went to the middle East and proposed them spending $14 trillion dollars on dedicated AI compute clusters. The race is on. General Nakasone is clearly there to manage this threat
NSA has all our info. So they probably have a super accurate AI. Nakasone is there to manage. You are correct.
Starlink+AI = Skynet
The Real question is...
Have they learned from the "mistakes" of Google Gemini?
If AI could potentially hack elections, than him coming in now would be perfect timing to make sure it doesn't happen.
It likely can't now, but, in four years?
Agreed.