They are looking for MOASS and/or personal gain mostly, which It's a valiant effort but the arena is still corrupt and ran by the Fed, and there's almost no way in hell the result they want will be achieved again.. GME'S rise several years ago was a one off that caught them off guard.. Though anything could happen, so I won't say I'm right or wrong, just my observation. They might drop the bags in a fake punt attempt and get something done here
What? GME ran to 80 a few weeks ago and that was after the 4 for 1 split. Fed can intervene if they want at the expense of losing all financial credibility in the international community.
Note that when GME went to 80, the major AI company's severs went down and BRK.A went to $180. I think it was WH test to see what is propping up the stock market and suppressing GME.
If we know the market must crash BIGLY in order for us to end the Fed, why continue propping it up by holding on GME?
They are looking for MOASS and/or personal gain mostly, which It's a valiant effort but the arena is still corrupt and ran by the Fed, and there's almost no way in hell the result they want will be achieved again.. GME'S rise several years ago was a one off that caught them off guard.. Though anything could happen, so I won't say I'm right or wrong, just my observation. They might drop the bags in a fake punt attempt and get something done here
What? GME ran to 80 a few weeks ago and that was after the 4 for 1 split. Fed can intervene if they want at the expense of losing all financial credibility in the international community.
Note that when GME went to 80, the major AI company's severs went down and BRK.A went to $180. I think it was WH test to see what is propping up the stock market and suppressing GME.
I'm not sure how your comment/reply relates to my post.