Just because you are just now noticing she exists doesn't mean she suddenly just became successful or that she's only now getting fans.
This type of stuff which is easily checked and proven wrong, like u/OffGridGuy has done, just makes us look bad as a group.
Especially when this is supposed to be an "elite research board". If we can't get simple stuff like this correct, how is anyone supposed to trust any of the research found here?
I'm curious to know how much research you put into this, and what methods you used.
It's just such a pointless thing to damage our reputation for. Seriously, what is the point here?
Just because you are just now noticing she exists doesn't mean she suddenly just became successful or that she's only now getting fans.
This type of stuff which is easily checked and proven wrong, like u/OffGridGuy has done, just makes us look bad as a group.
Especially when this is supposed to be an "elite research board". If we can't get simple stuff like this correct, how is anyone supposed to trust any of the research found here?
I'm curious to know how much research you put into this, and what methods you used.
It's just such a pointless thing to damage our reputation for. Seriously, what is the point here?