Her popularity was huge with the public, but the media hated her. I distinctly recall NYT and NPR hate articles written about her then famously apolitical persona and supposed Black appropriation.
That all stopped the moment she endorsed Democrats.
Just because you are just now noticing she exists doesn't mean she suddenly just became successful or that she's only now getting fans.
This type of stuff which is easily checked and proven wrong, like u/OffGridGuy has done, just makes us look bad as a group.
Especially when this is supposed to be an "elite research board". If we can't get simple stuff like this correct, how is anyone supposed to trust any of the research found here?
I'm curious to know how much research you put into this, and what methods you used.
It's just such a pointless thing to damage our reputation for. Seriously, what is the point here?
She sold her soul like so many others.
“Speak out against Trump and we’ll give you the world!”
Look into it a bit more closely, she was already the world's top selling artist three times before she criticized Trump.
All of these singers and actors, comedians are set up to succeed if they sell their souls. Same goes for most of government.
Her popularity was huge with the public, but the media hated her. I distinctly recall NYT and NPR hate articles written about her then famously apolitical persona and supposed Black appropriation.
That all stopped the moment she endorsed Democrats.
Yeah but she wasn’t in everyone’s face with Taylor mania before she did. Swifties weren’t even a thing.
Swifties have been a thing for over a decade. Here's Taylor discussing it back in 2012:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ehLp0cjqkRk
Just because you are just now noticing she exists doesn't mean she suddenly just became successful or that she's only now getting fans.
This type of stuff which is easily checked and proven wrong, like u/OffGridGuy has done, just makes us look bad as a group.
Especially when this is supposed to be an "elite research board". If we can't get simple stuff like this correct, how is anyone supposed to trust any of the research found here?
I'm curious to know how much research you put into this, and what methods you used.
It's just such a pointless thing to damage our reputation for. Seriously, what is the point here?
Don't forget how pro trans and gay she is.
She did. icymi
Warning - Graphic - NSFW, NSFL - Taylor Swift's hat.
Looks real to me. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fxk_dEvXwAAh2xg.jpg
Please warn when posting links to content like this. I don't know what I just saw but I wasn't ready for it.
Sorry about that. Fixed.
No way would she put that picture out there.
I saw this on a Chan a few years ago.
Another Katy Perry. Was part of Christian church then sold soul for fame.
No thank you. This world is temporary.
I was just thinking of the 'temporary' aspect...but then there seems to be a lot of monuments, etc
and some of President Trump's rallies planned according to location...
like maybe there are curses related to certain places that need to be lifted.
but then is the land even 'real'?
just trying to reconcile the statues etc. are we supposed to pay attention to the material world...not sure anymore.
There are probably a lot of cursed places if you don't have protection from Jesus Christ.
for sure. I just wonder if the places are 'real' or will they fade away & be replaced. Maybe this is just a practice world🤡