The lawsuite against pfizer awakened so many questions for me. I have not had time to look into all my questions. I hope you do or my questions can arise something.

Hear me out. When i heard about they lawsuite in kansas they mentioned that pfizer never accepted funding from operation warpspeed because they didnt want oversight. The bells in my head went ringing to this comment. How could we have been so blind? So far i have had time to look up who accepted warpspeed funds. The other players in the game johnson & johnson and moderna.

Do you remember the msm talked down johnson & johnson and moderna? Msm said they caused the same problems the pfizer is be accused of now?

In my own personal experience i was worried for people choosing johnson & johnson. I also knew people saying im getting pfizer because its the safest. It became an argument at what brand you were talking.

I remember all of us questioning trumps warpspeed while tring to justify it. He did what he needed to do. The companies he funded did what they needed to do.

And here comes my theory. The gain of function, vaccine, & plan was always there. Trump established a playing field for competition and right to choose. He gave a safe option. Unfortunately, pfizer was already pregaming. In this pfizer had the backing of powerful people. Pfizer was able to censor. Pfizer was able to deflect their flaws on others and dominate. It was all a money grab at the expense of lives. It was all a power grab at the expense of lives. Pfizer was never a part of warpspeed because they knew they would fail and knew they would succeed with others monies.

Disclaimer: I have not had time to lookup the terms and conditions of funding of operation warpspeed but this is where my trail of thought has led me without more information.