This is 100% true. There is no evidence that Peter was a Pope in history other than this misconstrued verse. Peter was also married and after Jesus' death Peter was seen showing favoritism to the Jews and Paul "withstood him to his face." So Peter needed to be corrected because of his actions as we all do. The way the Pope is portrayed, as basically a God to be worshipped on Earth, Peter would want nothing to do with this heresy.
"no evidence that Peter was a Pope in history other than this misconstrued verse"
Our Lord Jesus Christ . . . has placed the principal charge on the blessed Peter, chief of all the apostles. . . . He wished him who had been received into partnership in his undivided unity to be named what he himself was, when he said: “You are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my Church” [Mt 16:18], that the building of the eternal temple might rest on Peter’s solid rock, strengthening his Church so surely that neither human rashness could assail it nor the gates of hell prevail against it [Pope St. Leo I - Letters 10:1 (A.D. 445)].
Peter, πετρος, signifies a stone, or a fragment of a rock; and our Lord, whose constant custom it was to rise to heavenly things through the medium of earthly, takes occasion from the name, the metaphorical meaning of which was strength and stability, to point out the solidity of the confession, and the stability of that cause which should be founded on the Christ, the Son of the Living God.
In other words:
Upon this very rock, επι ταυτη τη πετρα - this true confession of yours- I am the Messiah.
Scripture often referrs to Jesus as a Stone, or a rock.
Psalm 118:22
Isaiah 28:16
Eph 2:20 Peter is one of the pieces of the foundation but Jesus is the cornerstone.
I Peter 2:4-5
Jesus did not say, on thee, Peter will I build my church, but changes immediately the expression and says, upon that very rock, επι ταυτη τη πετρα, to show that He neither addressed Peter, nor any other apostles.
There are many proofs, over 5000, of the scriptures that have been preserved. If you can show me where any of the verses I quoted have been reconstructed I will gladly accept the correction. But to think a man writing a long time ago is correct just because it's dated is dangerous.
John warns of the many antichrists that came from our own. The entire epistle of II Peter is about false doctrines and false teachers leading people astray, perverting the word of God.
Look at the Greek text concerning Matthew and you will see.
Again, the text is what matters not what a man said. Look at the preserved word of God. And seriously consider this thought. On Judgement day we will all be judged individually. You must read and understand for yourself.
5000 years from now what Joe Biden said about Trump still won't be true.
Jesus is the Rock, Peter a mere pebble. Jesus was referring to Peter's confession that Jesus is the Son of God, not Peter.
This is 100% true. There is no evidence that Peter was a Pope in history other than this misconstrued verse. Peter was also married and after Jesus' death Peter was seen showing favoritism to the Jews and Paul "withstood him to his face." So Peter needed to be corrected because of his actions as we all do. The way the Pope is portrayed, as basically a God to be worshipped on Earth, Peter would want nothing to do with this heresy.
"no evidence that Peter was a Pope in history other than this misconstrued verse"
I meant through inspired writings.
As for Peter's confession in Matthew 16
Peter, πετρος, signifies a stone, or a fragment of a rock; and our Lord, whose constant custom it was to rise to heavenly things through the medium of earthly, takes occasion from the name, the metaphorical meaning of which was strength and stability, to point out the solidity of the confession, and the stability of that cause which should be founded on the Christ, the Son of the Living God.
In other words:
Upon this very rock, επι ταυτη τη πετρα - this true confession of yours- I am the Messiah.
Scripture often referrs to Jesus as a Stone, or a rock. Psalm 118:22 Isaiah 28:16
Eph 2:20 Peter is one of the pieces of the foundation but Jesus is the cornerstone.
I Peter 2:4-5
Jesus did not say, on thee, Peter will I build my church, but changes immediately the expression and says, upon that very rock, επι ταυτη τη πετρα, to show that He neither addressed Peter, nor any other apostles.
AcesSilver + bible in 2024AD vs. Leo + bible in 445AD
Hmmm ... who is the more credible witness? Who is closer to the events in question?
everticus + bible in 2024AD vs. Cyprian + bible in 251AD
Hmm .... who is the more credible witness?
There are many proofs, over 5000, of the scriptures that have been preserved. If you can show me where any of the verses I quoted have been reconstructed I will gladly accept the correction. But to think a man writing a long time ago is correct just because it's dated is dangerous.
John warns of the many antichrists that came from our own. The entire epistle of II Peter is about false doctrines and false teachers leading people astray, perverting the word of God.
Look at the Greek text concerning Matthew and you will see.
Strange, Eusebius in 312AD seems to understand reality different than AcesSilver in 2024 AD who is 1700 years removed from the actual events.
Again, the text is what matters not what a man said. Look at the preserved word of God. And seriously consider this thought. On Judgement day we will all be judged individually. You must read and understand for yourself.
5000 years from now what Joe Biden said about Trump still won't be true.