The Ten Commandments are a reflection of goodness, but only that. They represent legalism, which is Luciferian light, as God’s children do not live according to legalism but fulfill those commandments by pursuing the fulfillment of God’s love.
Correct, but the Law is not for salvation, but for judgement. Read the first half of Romans. Youre mixing up the purpose of Law in bringing condemnation, which is necessary, with using the law as justification in salvation, which is not required.
I never said it was unnecessary. Of course it was necessary… but who is condemns? Who is the accuser? Who introduced us to the Law? It was the serpent. The Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil is the Law.
The Law simply is. It is the perfection of Hod, the standard of his nature. The Law itself condemns us, as you said, after Adam and Eve ate of the tree. The Law is the accuser and condemner. Which is my entire point , and Paul’s argument in Romans. Read Romans 5, it’s exactly this point.
The Ten Commandments are a reflection of goodness, but only that. They represent legalism, which is Luciferian light, as God’s children do not live according to legalism but fulfill those commandments by pursuing the fulfillment of God’s love.
Correct, but the Law is not for salvation, but for judgement. Read the first half of Romans. Youre mixing up the purpose of Law in bringing condemnation, which is necessary, with using the law as justification in salvation, which is not required.
I never said it was unnecessary. Of course it was necessary… but who is condemns? Who is the accuser? Who introduced us to the Law? It was the serpent. The Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil is the Law.
The Law simply is. It is the perfection of Hod, the standard of his nature. The Law itself condemns us, as you said, after Adam and Eve ate of the tree. The Law is the accuser and condemner. Which is my entire point , and Paul’s argument in Romans. Read Romans 5, it’s exactly this point.