Erm. HUNTER BIDEN case. Nothing to do with TRUMP case.
Trump is like any other civilian in this respect, and if he does it on social media, so does everyone else. The claim is that Trump's speach is inflaming his supoorters. But that is the Heckler's rule, or somerhing like that, whereby you cannot criminally charge someone for saying smething that 'caused someone else to do something'.
So, Jack Smith is trying to pre-empt something that is not criminal.
Sooo is Jack Smith attempting to put a gag on the whole internet?
Erm. HUNTER BIDEN case. Nothing to do with TRUMP case.
Trump is like any other civilian in this respect, and if he does it on social media, so does everyone else. The claim is that Trump's speach is inflaming his supoorters. But that is the Heckler's rule, or somerhing like that, whereby you cannot criminally charge someone for saying smething that 'caused someone else to do something'.
So, Jack Smith is trying to pre-empt something that is not criminal.
Sooo is Jack Smith attempting to put a gag on the whole internet?
Interesting.
Jack is desperate. Lets see what happens on Tuesday.