so again.. are we also outlawing artillery, cruise missiles, UAVs, etc? is a sniper rifle too unfair?
ridiculous line of reasoning. keeping your troops safe is a priority. if the task can be done just as well, or better, without endangering the lives of your men, you obviously take that opportunity.
When you fire a rifle at an enemy, you are on the ground and subject to all the dangers as is your enemy.
You are not safe in a building many miles away behind a computer screen directing a machine to take out human beings.
so again.. are we also outlawing artillery, cruise missiles, UAVs, etc? is a sniper rifle too unfair?
ridiculous line of reasoning. keeping your troops safe is a priority. if the task can be done just as well, or better, without endangering the lives of your men, you obviously take that opportunity.
The question I responded to was: what is the difference.