I applaud skepticism. Just be aware of and take in to account your own biases.

I don't know that she was ever a 'member' of the WEF. If you dig into the connections, I think you'll find out more about what the WEF themselves have been doing and how they have been attempting to recruit people, and that the connections are not always what they seem or even what they are presented as.

FYI, I've working in the sphere of some high-level international NGOs and I know from experience that a name association is not always evidence of actual collusion and/or corruption.

But like I say, I appreciate the skepticism. Sure, a regular person changing course and a public person changing course require different levels of attention, but .... well..... St Paul of Tarsus, right?

I guess I think that Gabbard, despite being on the left, is helping the cause in certain ways. I'm more interested in her impact than on a personal judgment or her quality as a person (outside my jurisdiction!)