![](https://media.greatawakening.win/preview/17tLFgBpoc.png)
JUST IN: Satanic Temple member found guilty of possession of 'very disturbing' child pornography in Idaho: police. "Numerous files of very disturbing child abuse and child pornography were found in Russell's possession during the investigation. Russell is a member of the Idaho chapter of The Satanic
(thepostmillennial.com)
🤢 FAGGOT-GATE 🤢
Take your straw man and shove it up your ass, dude. My patience for that shit is wearing thin, and that isn't the first time you've done it.
I'm frankly not quite sure if I believe you, but if you did indeed intend to put scandal, we disagree on pretty much nothing here and this has been mostly a misunderstanding. My only disagreement was with you claiming that the rate of pedo priests is higher than average, which is in my view the only way to properly understand what you wrote.
If you did mean to put scandal, the door is opened up to the option that you were simply listing all the places the pedo shit happens (i.e. everywhere) and didn't intend to imply any one being worse than the other.
Yes, I really did intend to add the word scandal. I don't know what's so unbelievable about that, given the rest of my comments.
Yes, I think most of this has been based on misunderstanding. I also think you're reading things into comments that just aren't there.
Take a step back, take a deep breath and maybe go read back through the conversation, and this time, don't automatically take everything so personally. And maybe don't expect preferential treatment for your religion.
If you don't have a problem with people shitting on other religions (or denominations within that religion) then don't get all pissy if/when someone shits on yours. (Though I don't believe I've shat on anyone's religion here.)
The only thing I misread was the other guy's comment.
Maybe I read some stuff into your later comments.
I certainly read your first comment properly.
I will not be chastised for your mistake. A mistake which is not that benign, despite being one missing word. What the wording you used insinuates is far different than if you added the extra word.
And the reason I'm kind of suspect at how genuine you are, is because you have straw manned me in almost every reply. For example, I never said I'm ok with you shitting on other people's religions. I certainly wouldn't be ok with you accusing any religion of all being pedophiles. I also never suggested mine get preferential treatment.
And from my perspective reading your comment how you wrote it, and then mulling it over briefly before responding, I appear to have been shat on. Though you didn't mean it, I suppose, so no harm no foul.
Ok. I apologize for not being clear in my comments. I sincerely was not trying to make it seem like the Catholic Church has any noticeably different percentage of pedophiles than any other religion. And the only reason why I didn't lump it in with Christianity is because I've seen too many arguments start here when they are lumped together. I was trying to avoid that from happening, not trying to pick on the Catholic Church.
I'm still interested in what your take on missionaries is, btw.
Ah, the sweet relief of reconciliation.
This is what I meant by that. Was hoping we could come to some understanding. I appreciate the apology.
And I suppose I could have been a bit nicer. Sorry if I was a bit too hard-nosed here. On the one hand, I don't want to bend over when I don't feel I'm the one who made the error, but on the other hand, I don't want to be a domineering asshole who gives no leeway and acts all self-righteous over other people making mistakes while not acknowledging his own.
Now frankly, it wasn't really a big mistake, it just made the difference in this case for how I think the comment comes across. I'm not too bent out of shape over it, if I gave off that impression. Just a minor spraying of shit, a dusting if you will... kek
And I have to say, I feel kind of bad now. I also usually try to put in that extra effort to avoid trivial arguments over how I word something, and now I'm the one starting the, one could argue, trivial argument.
And my case is somewhat the opposite, I guess. When I do see people mention Catholicism here, it's usually some kind of dig, so I am admittedly a bit on edge.
I kind of feel a bit of a fool, as well, to be honest. I'm sure it wasn't all your typo that got my defenses up, if I'm being fair.
Also, I responded to the missionary question. Really liked that question. I usually don't feel like I ever have to think twice about my positions (that's the ego), but with that one and the prior response I did. So thanks for supplying me with some intellectual stimulation :).
Yet another reason I mentioned reconciling. While I felt compelled to defend the Church due to our prior complications, I still prefer the more intellectual kinds of discussions versus the arguments.